On Monday, June 06, 2011 8:40:42 AM Werner Guttmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://cxf.apache.org/getting-involved.html seems to indicate that
> support for Castor as data binder still is being looked for. Is this
> actually correct ?
Yep. We haven't had anybody to start it.
> If yes, I am more than
Uh, Oh, I seem to have missed in in the tidal wave of incubator email.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>> The vote for WSS4J 1.6.1 has been started (hint: people with binding WS
>> votes,
>> please vote :-)
Hi
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> The vote for WSS4J 1.6.1 has been started (hint: people with binding WS votes,
> please vote :-) ) which is really the last holdup for 2.4.1. Thus, once
> the vote passes, I'd like to get 2.4.1 built and out as it fixes a TON of
> i
The vote for WSS4J 1.6.1 has been started (hint: people with binding WS votes,
please vote :-) ) which is really the last holdup for 2.4.1.Thus, once
the vote passes, I'd like to get 2.4.1 built and out as it fixes a TON of
issues.I think we're over 85 issues already.
If you hav
Hi,
http://cxf.apache.org/getting-involved.html seems to indicate that
support for Castor as data binder still is being looked for. Is this
actually correct ?
If yes, I am more than willing to look into this with a little help from
somebody educated enough on the CXF side. As far as Castor is con
