Hi Dan,
I can look into this item using a similar approach used in ws-rm using
the merged schemas.
Let me know if you see some issues.
thanks.
regards, aki
2012/2/3 Tony Su (Created) (JIRA) j...@apache.org:
Blueprint http
--
Key: CXF-4084
URL:
On Monday, February 06, 2012 1:16:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
Hi Dan,
I can look into this item using a similar approach used in ws-rm using
the merged schemas.
Let me know if you see some issues.
Just make sure you work with Johan Edstrom. I think he may have started
looking into this a bit
On Monday, February 06, 2012 11:39:24 AM Aki Yoshida wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have an option to be able to invoke oneway calls
synchronously so that the caller will get an HTTP 202 when no error
occurs at the provider side but it will get an HTTP 500 SOAP fault
when some error occurs. There
We have 6 binding +1 votes, I'm going to promote the artifacts shortly
Thanks, Sergey
On 02/02/12 13:33, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Apache CXF DOSGI subproject is a Reference Implementation of the OSGI
Remote Services Specification which offers an alternative approach
toward dynamically deploying
2012/2/6 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
On Monday, February 06, 2012 11:39:24 AM Aki Yoshida wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have an option to be able to invoke oneway calls
synchronously so that the caller will get an HTTP 202 when no error
occurs at the provider side but it will get an HTTP 500
Hi Johan,
Dan mentioned that you might have started working on this item. Please
let me know whether I can help here.
Thanks.
Regards, aki
2012/2/6 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
On Monday, February 06, 2012 1:16:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
Hi Dan,
I can look into this item using a similar
On Monday, February 06, 2012 5:50:05 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
2012/2/6 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
On Monday, February 06, 2012 11:39:24 AM Aki Yoshida wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have an option to be able to invoke oneway calls
synchronously so that the caller will get an HTTP 202 when no
2012/2/6 Johan Edstrom seij...@gmail.com:
I got about as far as looking at the http:jetty schemas and was hoping I'd be
able to
consolidate some of the parts there.
I'm currently on the road 3h + on EST, so I think I might be fighting jet lag
for a day or so.
I'll be available for testing
Heh :)
Not 100% sure we said the same thing here.
I'm gone for about the next 4 days, I might start if, if you want to, please go
ahead.
The customer I was out with that put the ticket in was basically looking for
jetty + ssl config.
The client side stuff would not necessarily have to
