+1
Thanks, Sergey
On 27/03/12 02:00, David Bosschaert wrote:
The Apache CXF DOSGi subproject is the Reference Implementation of the
OSGi Remote Services and Remote Services Admin Service specifications
[1] which provide a distributed computing model based around OSGi
Services.
We have been
+1
Thanks
Freeman
On 2012-3-27, at 上午9:00, David Bosschaert wrote:
The Apache CXF DOSGi subproject is the Reference Implementation of the
OSGi Remote Services and Remote Services Admin Service specifications
[1] which provide a distributed computing model based around OSGi
Services.
We have
On Monday, March 26, 2012 03:32:11 PM YUL wrote:
Hi All,
I'm a newbie in CXF ws-notification. I found the example in the
distribution/release and it runs fine. However, the example only shows how
to publish a String message to the broker. How do I publish a
user-defined object to the broker
Currenly that's not really supported. The main problem is that we'd need
to persist the WS-Notification subscriptions in addition to creating
durable jms subcribers and that's not yet supported. It's on my todo list
but not sure when I'll have enough time to start working on that.
On Tue, Mar
+1
Dan
On Monday, March 26, 2012 09:00:40 PM David Bosschaert wrote:
The Apache CXF DOSGi subproject is the Reference Implementation of the
OSGi Remote Services and Remote Services Admin Service specifications
[1] which provide a distributed computing model based around OSGi
Services.
Just a quick update on the Camel side:
I ran the Camel tests and such with 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT without any major
issues. I had to adjust some dependencies in Camel to account for things
marked optional and add the extra jaxrs providers, but once that was done,
the Camel code compiled and tested
For 2.6, we'll need a newer version of cxf-xjc and I'd like to get that out
ahead of time. There is also a minor checkstyle change in cxf-buildtoosl
Would there be any objection if I did that build tomorrow or thursday just
to get it out of the way to not hold up 2.6.0 later?
--
Daniel
+1
On Mar 27, 2012, at 1:09 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
For 2.6, we'll need a newer version of cxf-xjc and I'd like to get that out
ahead of time. There is also a minor checkstyle change in cxf-buildtoosl
Would there be any objection if I did that build tomorrow or thursday just
to get
+1
Thanks
Freeman
On 2012-3-28, at 上午3:09, Daniel Kulp wrote:
For 2.6, we'll need a newer version of cxf-xjc and I'd like to get
that out
ahead of time. There is also a minor checkstyle change in cxf-
buildtoosl
Would there be any objection if I did that build tomorrow or
thursday just
