Re: Release cxf-xjc and cxf-buildtools tomorrow?

+1. Colm. On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Freeman Fang wrote: > +1 > > Thanks > Freeman > > On 2012-3-28, at 上午3:09, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> For 2.6, we'll need a newer version of cxf-xjc and I'd like to get that >> out >> ahead of time.   There is also a minor checkstyle change in cxf-build

Re: [VOTE] Apache DOSGi 1.3.1 Release

+1. Colm. On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > +1 > > Dan > > > On Monday, March 26, 2012 09:00:40 PM David Bosschaert wrote: >> The Apache CXF DOSGi subproject is the Reference Implementation of the >> OSGi Remote Services and Remote Services Admin Service specifications >> [

Re: [VOTE] Apache DOSGi 1.3.1 Release

+1 Christian Am 27.03.2012 03:00, schrieb David Bosschaert: The Apache CXF DOSGi subproject is the Reference Implementation of the OSGi Remote Services and Remote Services Admin Service specifications [1] which provide a distributed computing model based around OSGi Services. We have been work

Re: [VOTE] Apache DOSGi 1.3.1 Release

+1 aki 2012/3/27 David Bosschaert : > The Apache CXF DOSGi subproject is the Reference Implementation of the > OSGi Remote Services and Remote Services Admin Service specifications > [1] which provide a distributed computing model based around OSGi > Services. > > We have been working on CXF-DOS

Role based access control with SAML in CXF

Hi guys I'd like to look into the following JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3522 The CXF service provider gets a SAML token which contains an AttributeStatement with claims information. One claim can be the roles. An initial fix (maybe I create a seperate JIRA) shall only

Re: Role based access control with SAML in CXF

+1 sounds good. Colm. On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Oliver Wulff wrote: > Hi guys > > > > I'd like to look into the following JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3522 > > > > The CXF service provider gets a SAML token which contains an > AttributeStatement with claims inform

Re: [VOTE] Apache DOSGi 1.3.1 Release

+1 Jeff On Mar 28, 2012, at 3:13 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > +1. > > Colm. > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> Dan >> >> >> On Monday, March 26, 2012 09:00:40 PM David Bosschaert wrote: >>> The Apache CXF DOSGi subproject is the Reference Implementa

AW: Role based access control with SAML in CXF

Raised a separate JIRA for RBAC support for JAX-WS: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4212 -- Oliver Wulff Blog: http://owulff.blogspot.com Solution Architect http://coders.talend.com Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com

jaxrs and minimal bundles for 2.6.0?

Quick question: Are the jaxrs and minimal bundles still needed for 2.6.0? With the new little bundles, neither really makes any sense anymore. The minimal bundle is far from minimal (it's grown fairly large). Folks needed a more minimal environment are better just grabbing the individual

Re: jaxrs and minimal bundles for 2.6.0?

Hi Dan On 28/03/12 16:16, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Quick question: > Are the jaxrs and minimal bundles still needed for 2.6.0? With the new > little bundles, neither really makes any sense anymore. > > The minimal bundle is far from minimal (it's grown fairly large). Folks > needed a more minimal

Should be JSONP interceptors moved to rt-rs-security-cors

Hi Benson, all, I was wondering if it would make sense to move the JSONP interceptors to the CORS module. They are in rt-rs-extension-providers (on the trunk) right now, and seem a bit out place there, I'm reading CORS is a modern alternative to JSONP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-or

Move JAX-RS claims classes to frontend independent module rt/security

Hi all I'd like to start working on the RBAC (see mail "Role based access control with SAML in CXF") and the Claims support for JAX-WS. Sergey has already implemented that for JAX-RS. I'd propose to move these classes (claims, annotations) to a frontend independent module like rt/security thus