Migrating to blueprint will also solve
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-69 which is a
long-standing issue that many people want to see resolved.
David
On 28 May 2012 18:51, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-115
The
Hi Willem
I'd really prefer us discussing updates like this one to the public
client API that the CXF JAX-RS runtime offers.
I can see you just added 5 or so new JAXRSClientFactory methods.
I consider most of them redundant. JAXRSClientFactory is a *utility*
factory and is already a bit
By the way, Willem, if you have any specific preference on how such a
single method would like then lets work on it, ping me here or IRC
I'm thinking of having the one or max two methods which can take an
address, class, and the list of features. JAXRSClientFactory can not
take all the
11 new methods have been introduced, with 3 of the existing methods made
to loop by mistake.
I have replaced them with a single one that should catch most of the
typical cases where setting a features is also required. Also added a
similar WebClient factory method.
Lets chat next time
On 29/05/12 08:12, David Bosschaert wrote:
Migrating to blueprint will also solve
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-69 which is a
long-standing issue that many people want to see resolved.
Agreed. I'd still see this migration as a 1.4-level issue.
I can see 4-5 issues in the list that
Hi Sergey,
JAXRSClientFactory provides the static method to create the proxy or the
client. I didn't find a better way to apply the features to all these
method by just changing a single method.
If you have a better idea, please share it with me.
BTW, I just found my commit introduced a
On 29/05/12 14:07, Willem Jiang wrote:
Hi Sergey,
JAXRSClientFactory provides the static method to create the proxy or the
client. I didn't find a better way to apply the features to all these
method by just changing a single method.
If you have a better idea, please share it with me.
BTW, I
Hi,
I just have a chance to go through the missing feature of JMS transport
to support cxfrs frontend.
Current JMS transport doesn't send out Message.REQUEST_URI and
Message.HTTP_REQUEST_METHOD properties as the HTTP transport does.
So it hard for use the use the cxfrs frontend with JMS
Hi Willem
On 29/05/12 14:53, Willem Jiang wrote:
Hi,
I just have a chance to go through the missing feature of JMS transport
to support cxfrs frontend.
Current JMS transport doesn't send out Message.REQUEST_URI and
Message.HTTP_REQUEST_METHOD properties as the HTTP transport does.
So it hard
On Tue May 29 22:33:59 2012, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Willem
On 29/05/12 14:53, Willem Jiang wrote:
Hi,
I just have a chance to go through the missing feature of JMS transport
to support cxfrs frontend.
Current JMS transport doesn't send out Message.REQUEST_URI and
We have a bunch of test failures in the rs-security stuff with Java 5:
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-F/view/CXF/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK15/
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-F/view/CXF/job/CXF-2.5.x/
which needs to get resolved before the release. Thus, I'm going to delay
this build until
On 29/05/12 21:10, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We have a bunch of test failures in the rs-security stuff with Java 5:
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-F/view/CXF/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK15/
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-F/view/CXF/job/CXF-2.5.x/
which needs to get resolved before the release. Thus, I'm
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 09:49:36 PM Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
On 29/05/12 21:10, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We have a bunch of test failures in the rs-security stuff with Java 5:
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-F/view/CXF/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK15/
Hi
On 29/05/12 21:52, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 09:49:36 PM Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
On 29/05/12 21:10, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We have a bunch of test failures in the rs-security stuff with Java 5:
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-F/view/CXF/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK15/
Hi ,
I just found I forgot to commit merge of r1343561 yesterday. And it was
marked as integrated in CXF-2.4.x branch.
I will commit the patch after running some tests, It could be better if
we redo the CXF 2.4.8 release again.
Sorry for the mass that I made.
Willem
On Wed May 30 06:02:54
On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 09:14:25 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
Hi ,
I just found I forgot to commit merge of r1343561 yesterday. And it was
marked as integrated in CXF-2.4.x branch.
I will commit the patch after running some tests, It could be better if
we redo the CXF 2.4.8 release again.
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
