I just cloned and checked out some of the tags and branches from
cxf-test. I think it looks pretty good now.
Should we do an official vote about the switch or can we already
consider this discussion a consensus?
The other question is when to switch. I am in no hurry to do so. From my
side
Hi Dan,
My (non-binding) +1.
Would like to double check if my update for CXF-5512 discussed in
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1560703-in-cxf-branches-2-7-x-fixes-api-src-main-java-org-apache-cxf-service-invoker--td5739028.html
is enough for JBoss and TomEE folks (strictly
On Jan 27, 2014, at 4:17 AM, Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net
wrote:
I just cloned and checked out some of the tags and branches from cxf-test. I
think it looks pretty good now.
Should we do an official vote about the switch or can we already consider
this discussion a
On 27/01/14 16:43, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
Hi Dan,
My (non-binding) +1.
Would like to double check if my update for CXF-5512 discussed in
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1560703-in-cxf-branches-2-7-x-fixes-api-src-main-java-org-apache-cxf-service-invoker--td5739028.html
is
Hi Oli,
That's awesome - I'll get back up to speed on the project over the
next couple of weeks and give some feedback.
Many thanks,
Chris
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Oliver Wulff owu...@talend.com wrote:
Hi there
As mentioned in this thread the plan is to provide REST interfaces for
Hi Dan
Many thanks for your help here. Perhaps we can also make it more visible
at the JAX-WS level, though it's quite handy that IOUtils can be called
directly
Cheers, Sergey
On 27/01/14 18:59, dk...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dkulp
Date: Mon Jan 27 18:59:37 2014
New Revision: 1561791
