RE: [VOTE] CXF 2.6.16

2014-10-07 Thread Andrei Shakirin
+1, Andrei. > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > Sent: Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2014 22:00 > To: dev@cxf.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] CXF 2.6.16 > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.6.16. This release is JUST to fix the > problems > running 2.6.15 with Java5

Re: Saml callback handler

2014-10-07 Thread Jason Pell
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-516 On 08/10/2014 10:19 AM, "Jason Pell" wrote: > Would it be acceptable to change cxf to set the saml version on the Saml > callback before calling the callback. > > I want to be able to create a bearer token inside a local callback and I > want to hand

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.6.16

2014-10-07 Thread Freeman Fang
+1 - Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat On 2014-10-8, at 上午3:59, Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 2.6.16. This release is JUST to fix the > problems running 2.6.15 with Java5. All the changes between 2.6.15 and > 2.6.16 are dir

Re: Builds tomorrow....

2014-10-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
Just an follow up… I was able to fix all the java5 issues and build 2.6.15 and the vote is started.2.7.13 is built and staged, but I want to look at the staging real quick before I call the vote.However, I’ve been struggling trying to get 3.0.2 built. I’ve had all kinds of various fa

Saml callback handler

2014-10-07 Thread Jason Pell
Would it be acceptable to change cxf to set the saml version on the Saml callback before calling the callback. I want to be able to create a bearer token inside a local callback and I want to handle saml 1 and 2 automatically based on the wsdl WS policy. At the moment I can't do that. If I could c

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.6.16

2014-10-07 Thread Andriy Redko
+1 Andriy DK> This is a vote to release CXF 2.6.16. This release is JUST to fix the problems running 2.6.15 with Java5. All DK> the changes between 2.6.15 and 2.6.16 are directly related to getting it to build, run, and test with Java5. This DK> does include downgrading a couple of depende

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.6.16

2014-10-07 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 Cheers, Sergey On 07/10/14 20:59, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.6.16. This release is JUST to fix the problems running 2.6.15 with Java5. All the changes between 2.6.15 and 2.6.16 are directly related to getting it to build, run, and test with Java5. This does inc

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.6.16

2014-10-07 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff On Oct 7, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 2.6.16. This release is JUST to fix the > problems running 2.6.15 with Java5. All the changes between 2.6.15 and > 2.6.16 are directly related to getting it to build, run, and test with Java5. > This

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.6.16

2014-10-07 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
+1 - Dennis On 10/08/2014 08:59 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.6.16. This release is JUST to fix the problems running 2.6.15 with Java5. All the changes between 2.6.15 and 2.6.16 are directly related to getting it to build, run, and test with Java5. This does i

[VOTE] CXF 2.6.16

2014-10-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
This is a vote to release CXF 2.6.16. This release is JUST to fix the problems running 2.6.15 with Java5. All the changes between 2.6.15 and 2.6.16 are directly related to getting it to build, run, and test with Java5. This does include downgrading a couple of dependencies back to the 2.6.1

[GitHub] cxf pull request: enhancing readability #CXF-5688

2014-10-07 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/24 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled

Re: On finalize() potential issues

2014-10-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
When IBM’s java 7 came out, we got bit by this pretty hard as it would garbage collect the proxy before the invokes were complete. Many of our system tests and such were failing. I did a bunch of experimenting with the IBM jdk to find something that would work. I settled on: git diff f

Re: Builds tomorrow....

2014-10-07 Thread Eirik Bjørsnøs
Daniel, We're still being bitten by CXF-6010 [1] for which the fix is a simple one line null-check. Would be great to see that fixed so we can re-enable schema validation for our tests. The fix is rather trivial, but I've attached a patch to CXF-6010 for it anyhow. [1] https://issues.apache.org/

On finalize() potential issues

2014-10-07 Thread Alessio Soldano
Hi, some of you might already be aware that the finalize mechanism in the JVM is basically flawed and there could be issues even when it's used for commonly accepted reasons (like cleaning up stuff that the user forgot about). A very interesting presentation has been recently made available on