Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

2022-09-09 Thread Andriy Redko
Hi Jim, That is correct, I am working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8717 as part of Jetty 11 migration, the Atmosphere implementation seems to be fine. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko JM> Thanks for the update, Andiry. You already did a lot of work on third party JM>

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

2022-09-09 Thread Freeman Fang
+1 for this way, it's much easier. Thanks! Freeman On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 3:55 PM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hi Jim, > > It sounds easier, requiring less efforts, I agree. > Colm, Freeman, are you on board with this approach guys? > Thanks! > > Best Regards, > Andriy Redko > > JM> Hi Andriy, >

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

2022-09-09 Thread Andriy Redko
Hi Jim, It sounds easier, requiring less efforts, I agree. Colm, Freeman, are you on board with this approach guys? Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko JM> Hi Andriy, JM> From what I looked at last time, it seems it's difficult to decouple these JM> osgi/karaf integration code from cxf core

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

2022-09-09 Thread Jim Ma
Thanks for the update, Andiry. You already did a lot of work on third party jakarta support ! Just to understand the CXF Jakarta support work status, are these issues we can start without waiting for the dependency release ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8716

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

2022-09-09 Thread Jim Ma
Hi Andriy, >From what I looked at last time, it seems it's difficult to decouple these osgi/karaf integration code from cxf core and create a new project to put it into a separate repository. IMO, we can create a branch before we remove these integration codes, and later we can look at this branch