[GitHub] [cxf] jimma commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

2022-11-07 Thread GitBox
jimma commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1016068438 ## distribution/src/main/release/samples/pom.xml: ## @@ -210,6 +216,49 @@ + + +spring.snapshots +

[GitHub] [cxf] jimma commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

2022-11-07 Thread GitBox
jimma commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1016068325 ## distribution/src/main/release/samples/pom.xml: ## @@ -210,6 +216,49 @@ + + Review Comment: Done. -- This is an automated

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

2022-11-07 Thread GitBox
reta commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1015833286 ## distribution/src/main/release/samples/pom.xml: ## @@ -240,108 +289,8 @@ - -java9-plus - -

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

2022-11-07 Thread Freeman Fang
Hello, FWIW, Spring isn't mandatory for CXF, cxf-core only depends on spring optionally and we don't need to have spring artifacts on the classpath if we don't want to use spring/spring boot features, and this has been the case for a very long time. Freeman On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 1:22 PM

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

2022-11-07 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
I was more referencing the long awaited split of cxf-core (it is still the same old content than for the early jaxws time and without a modular design - this is where spring comes from mainly IIRC) so for a 4.0.0 this sounds like a big awaited features (don't start by bringing 1.4M said

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

2022-11-07 Thread Andriy Redko
Hi Romain, Thanks a lot for the feedback, just to clarify: we won't be dropping Spring (this is basically another "few months long" effort), it is merely to try to not bring any dependency with JDK-17 baseline (== Spring / Spring Boot at this moment) by default. It would definitely require more

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

2022-11-07 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Think Java 11 is a good baseline as of today - at least to enable Jakarta vendors to use CXF as an implementation and pass tck. +1 to drop spring if it bothers to get a first 4.0.0 release out, we can catch up later like other dropped integrations and core should be exploded anyway, it is way too

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

2022-11-07 Thread Freeman Fang
+1 to release CXF 4.0.0. And +1 to release using JDK17 as baseline since we upgraded to Spring 6 and Spring Boot 3. Thanks to all guys involved in this long process! Freeman On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 11:10 AM Andriy Redko wrote: > +1 to move forward with release (or milestone), but before that,

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

2022-11-07 Thread Andriy Redko
+1 to move forward with release (or milestone), but before that, there is one issue which I would like to bring up and agree us upon. The initial discussion for Jakarta / 4.0.0 [1] concluded on having JDK-11 as a baseline. At the same time, there is a misalignment with Spring 6 / Spring Boot 3

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

2022-11-07 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 to release, there are too much forks out there already so better to release partially than not release at all IMHO Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

2022-11-07 Thread Misagh
Hello all, If possible, I'd like to ask that you allow v4 to ship with a new release of wss4j that would contain this change: https://github.com/apache/ws-wss4j/pull/62 At the moment, OpenSAML v5 is not released yet, but it is anticipated to be GA before end of this year, hopefully. On Mon, Nov

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

2022-11-07 Thread GitBox
reta commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1015411106 ## distribution/src/main/release/samples/pom.xml: ## @@ -210,6 +216,49 @@ + + +spring.snapshots +

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

2022-11-07 Thread GitBox
reta commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1015410649 ## distribution/src/main/release/samples/pom.xml: ## @@ -210,6 +216,49 @@ + + Review Comment: I think we could remove snapshots,

JDK 20 EAb22, ZenGC EA builds, JavaFX 20 EAb5 and several heads-ups!

2022-11-07 Thread David Delabassee
Greetings, With JavaOne in Las Vegas, last month was epically busy! It was great to finally have the ability to meet and discuss the Quality Outreach program with some of you... face-to-face! This installment of the newsletter is packed as we have several heads-ups, including new

CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

2022-11-07 Thread Jim Ma
Hi all, After 9 months of work, we finally fixed/worked around all issues for Jakarta support. Now all the cxf tests are passed: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/848/ and we can say that CXF successfully migrated to Jakarta namespace(and support Jakarta EE9.1). To get cxf jakarta