I got rid of the references to the remoteadmin and compendium modules,
things seem to be OK, so we are nearly ready to go for 1.3
Sergey
On 25/01/12 07:48, David Bosschaert wrote:
+1 on including the enterprise jar. It should also replace the
compendium jar if that's currently mentioned in the
+1 on including the enterprise jar. It should also replace the
compendium jar if that's currently mentioned in the project...
Cheers,
David
On 24 January 2012 18:37, jbert wrote:
> I second the need for the enterprise API jar.
>
> I would also like to note that the POMs in trunk still need to b
I second the need for the enterprise API jar.
I would also like to note that the POMs in trunk still need to be changed to
point to the org.osgi.enterprise JAR, right now they're still pointing to
the remoteadmin project. This means that the current sources cannot be built
unless you check out a r
I'm thinking that
org.osgi/org.osgi.enterprise/org.osgi.enterprise-4.2.0.jar needs to be
included in the single bundle distro (this is a replacement for the
dosgi ri local copy of the remote admin packages).
As a side note may be we should add a dosgi feature into our CXF Karaf
profile, as my
Hi All,
Dan, myself and David talked about the possibility of releasing DOSGi RI
1.3 based on Apache CXF.
There are few reasons why we thought it was a good idea to pursue it.
We are seeing a number of users periodically asking DOSGI-related
questions and it's been unfortunate that some basi
