Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-07-12 Thread David Bosschaert
On 11 July 2012 22:42, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David, All So far I'm really behind the target of getting DOSGI 1.3.2 released around this time of the year. I'm managed to get a bit of time and resolved DOSGI-111, however it's difficult for me right now to prioritize on

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-07-12 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
On 12/07/12 10:10, David Bosschaert wrote: On 11 July 2012 22:42, Sergey Beryozkinsberyoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David, All So far I'm really behind the target of getting DOSGI 1.3.2 released around this time of the year. I'm managed to get a bit of time and resolved DOSGI-111, however it's

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-07-11 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi David, All So far I'm really behind the target of getting DOSGI 1.3.2 released around this time of the year. I'm managed to get a bit of time and resolved DOSGI-111, however it's difficult for me right now to prioritize on other DOSGI JIRAs - I'm a bit overwhelmed with the current and the

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-29 Thread David Bosschaert
Migrating to blueprint will also solve https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-69 which is a long-standing issue that many people want to see resolved. David On 28 May 2012 18:51, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote: FYI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-115 The

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-29 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
On 29/05/12 08:12, David Bosschaert wrote: Migrating to blueprint will also solve https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-69 which is a long-standing issue that many people want to see resolved. Agreed. I'd still see this migration as a 1.4-level issue. I can see 4-5 issues in the list that

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-28 Thread David Bosschaert
Sounds good, Sergey. I'm all for releasing frequently. One of the things that I think would be good to tackle is to migrate to OSGi Blueprint (from of the current Spring-based approach). Is that something that you were thinking of looking at? Cheers, David On 28 May 2012 17:34, Sergey

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-28 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi David On 28/05/12 18:09, David Bosschaert wrote: Sounds good, Sergey. I'm all for releasing frequently. One of the things that I think would be good to tackle is to migrate to OSGi Blueprint (from of the current Spring-based approach). Is that something that you were thinking of looking at?

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-28 Thread David Bosschaert
I can understand that it's a significant refactoring. If you stay within the pure Blueprint model (within the spec) you shouldn't get bound to Aries. Eclipse Gemini also has an implementation. Cheers, David On 28 May 2012 18:17, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David On

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-28 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
On 28/05/12 18:35, David Bosschaert wrote: I can understand that it's a significant refactoring. If you stay within the pure Blueprint model (within the spec) you shouldn't get bound to Aries. Eclipse Gemini also has an implementation. Sure and there was a proposal on how to get Gemini used

Re: Thoughts about DOSGI 1.3.2 release

2012-05-28 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
FYI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-115 The proposed fix will probably work with Gemini straight away :-) Sergey On 28/05/12 18:45, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: On 28/05/12 18:35, David Bosschaert wrote: I can understand that it's a significant refactoring. If you stay within the