On 11 July 2012 22:42, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David, All
So far I'm really behind the target of getting DOSGI 1.3.2 released around
this time of the year. I'm managed to get a bit of time and resolved
DOSGI-111, however it's difficult for me right now to prioritize on
On 12/07/12 10:10, David Bosschaert wrote:
On 11 July 2012 22:42, Sergey Beryozkinsberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David, All
So far I'm really behind the target of getting DOSGI 1.3.2 released around
this time of the year. I'm managed to get a bit of time and resolved
DOSGI-111, however it's
Hi David, All
So far I'm really behind the target of getting DOSGI 1.3.2 released
around this time of the year. I'm managed to get a bit of time and
resolved DOSGI-111, however it's difficult for me right now to
prioritize on other DOSGI JIRAs - I'm a bit overwhelmed with the current
and the
Migrating to blueprint will also solve
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-69 which is a
long-standing issue that many people want to see resolved.
David
On 28 May 2012 18:51, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-115
The
On 29/05/12 08:12, David Bosschaert wrote:
Migrating to blueprint will also solve
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-69 which is a
long-standing issue that many people want to see resolved.
Agreed. I'd still see this migration as a 1.4-level issue.
I can see 4-5 issues in the list that
Sounds good, Sergey. I'm all for releasing frequently.
One of the things that I think would be good to tackle is to migrate
to OSGi Blueprint (from of the current Spring-based approach). Is that
something that you were thinking of looking at?
Cheers,
David
On 28 May 2012 17:34, Sergey
Hi David
On 28/05/12 18:09, David Bosschaert wrote:
Sounds good, Sergey. I'm all for releasing frequently.
One of the things that I think would be good to tackle is to migrate
to OSGi Blueprint (from of the current Spring-based approach). Is that
something that you were thinking of looking at?
I can understand that it's a significant refactoring.
If you stay within the pure Blueprint model (within the spec) you
shouldn't get bound to Aries. Eclipse Gemini also has an
implementation.
Cheers,
David
On 28 May 2012 18:17, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David
On
On 28/05/12 18:35, David Bosschaert wrote:
I can understand that it's a significant refactoring.
If you stay within the pure Blueprint model (within the spec) you
shouldn't get bound to Aries. Eclipse Gemini also has an
implementation.
Sure and there was a proposal on how to get Gemini used
FYI:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-115
The proposed fix will probably work with Gemini straight away :-)
Sergey
On 28/05/12 18:45, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
On 28/05/12 18:35, David Bosschaert wrote:
I can understand that it's a significant refactoring.
If you stay within the
10 matches
Mail list logo