rg.apache.cxf.wsdl11.WSDLRuntimeException: Fail to create
> > >>>> wsdl
> >
> > >>>> definition from :
> > file:/home/sberyozkin/work/cxf/2.2.x/systests/uncategorized/src/test/reso
> > urces/wsdl_systest/soap_fault.wsdl
> >
> > >>>> Caused by : WSDLException (at /definitions/types/s:schema):
> > >>>> faultCode=PARSER_ERROR: Problem parsing '
> > >>>> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/'<
> >
> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/%27>.:
> > >>>> org.xml.sax.SAXParseException:
> > >>>> The declaration for the entity "ContentType" must end with '>'.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Is it only me ? Can someone try and build the 2.2.x ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> thanks, Sergey
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Alessio Soldano
> > >>> Web Service Lead, JBoss
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
was resubmitted to mitre. Hopefully it will get updated in a day or
two.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
yet looked at the JAX-RS 1.1 TCK, hopefully in the next week or two
we can at least look at that to see how far off we are and gage what needs to
be done there.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
ng
> WSDL information. This is particularly useful when serving up WSDL for a
> secure endpoint via an insecure port. Regards,
> Seumas
None really.For the most part, in those cases, we would suggest using
static WSDL files served up as normal files.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Jax-ws-schemaLocation-X
> SD-specified-td1046395.html#a1046395 [2]
> http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/customizing_jaxb_artifacts#BindingFile
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-ref/#section-scd-syntax
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
es it
require a lot of code changes as well?
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
thing* to do with the
> parsing or syntax of the schemaLocation values in the JAXB binding file--it
> just feeds the file to XJC for the latter to either accept or complain
> based on the particular XJC version's syntax?
>
> Glen
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
this was a major milestone toward getting 2.3 out
the door.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
successfully. We're all excited about the new features these
projects will bring to CXF.
On the Distributed OSGi front, 1.2 should be released shortly. The last
couple of issues targeted for the release were resolved this week so final
preps are being made to roll the release.
--
Dan
k)
2) Spring - should we use 3.0.0 instead of 2.5.6?I think the answer for
this is "go ahead". We've already have profiles to test this and the same
code seems to work OK with 2.5.6 and 3.0.0. Just want to double check with
folks though.
I'd like to hear peoples thought
ime doing
other things. :-(
I really hate mocks.
Dan
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > Since we are getting close to having 2.3 ready to release, I'm kind of
> > looking at the various deps to see if there are updates we should grab
> > o
this in Benson's thread about jetty 7 in a bit.
Dan
>
> Craig.
>
> On 2010-07-17, at 6:23 AM, Cyrille Le Clerc wrote:
> > +1 for upgrading to Spring 3 and Jetty 7.
> >
> > Cyrille
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >
uld make UsernamePassword a
bit easier to use on certain containers.
Dan
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Willem Jiang
wrote:
> > Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >> On Thursday 15 July 2010 2:33:26 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> >>> The first part of the JIRA I filed a
you can look at the
failing system tests?
Dan
On Saturday 17 July 2010 12:08:18 pm Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday 15 July 2010 9:53:28 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> > The continuation code is very different. I attached a first pass
> > patch. It does not pass unit tests because I
binding schema types may be used directly for
> child elements of the wrapper, meaning the return from these methods
> might be "java.lang.String", "java.lang.Integer", or even just "int" (in
> the case of a required element). How will CXF use these types of re
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 5:19:42 pm Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> On 07/22/2010 06:42 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > ...
> > Well, no. It's ONLY used for code generation. Not used for runtime at
> > all. It's mostly for filling in things like the classname attribute of
do this.
Alternatively, on the services, you can add:
@DataBinding(MyCustomDataBinding.class)
to let the runtime know that this service uses that databinding.
Dan
>
> Best regards,
> Mina R Waheeb
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
ed.
As long as that flag is sent, it won't send responses back. Kind of had to
put a hack in place to turn that off. :-(
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:48:15 pm Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:26:31 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> > I did a fair amount of debugging, and I am so-far stumped. CXFServlet
> > calls into the JAX-RS thicket, but somehow by the time it has gone
> > arou
efinitely getting closer.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.2
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Friday 23 July 2010 1:44:54 pm Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Friday 23 July 2010 12:58:03 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> > There's no content length in the response in
> > testAddBookCustomFailureStatus, so it can't or won't read the response
> > object, and it fails.
&g
e.
> 2: for each sample, there's some sort of server and then some sort of
> client. We can at least launch the server, launch the client, and
> verify that nothing explodes.
Something to experiment with I suppose. :-)
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
mp;r2=9
> > 79133&view=diff
> >
> > == --- cxf/trunk/pom.xml (original)
> > +++ cxf/trunk/pom.xml Mon Jul 26 01:43:41 2010
> > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
> > rt
> > integration
> > maven-plugins
> > - test-samples
> > +
> > systests
> >
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
ndError: javax/servlet/ServletInputStream
> at
> org.apache.cxf.transport.http_jetty.JettyHTTPTransportFactory.createDestin
> ation(JettyHTTPTransportFactory.java:100) at
> org.apache.cxf.transport.http_jetty.JettyHTTPTransportFactory.getDestinati
> on(JettyHTTPTransportFactory.java:86)
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
On Saturday 24 July 2010 3:44:18 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> Dan, we're good to merge afaict.
We should be all merged OK now. Hit a couple java5 snags, but the latest
hudson build looks good.
git sure made merging this in one shot quite easy. :-)
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.
#x27;t used that since the 2.1 branch. Making it inherit the
versions from the cxf-parent pom at least makes sure the versions are the same
and keeps the versions in a single place.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
my opinion, busting the samples should be a *big deal*, and making
> all builds run them is thus higher on my list than some of the more
> obscure system tests. But I can see the argument the other way around.
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >
go through and add them. No patch needed to go to the maven
team.
There is a archetype:crawl and archetype:update-local-catalog target for
creating a catalog for your local repo. I don't know much about them.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
On Monday 26 July 2010 5:08:51 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Monday 26 July 2010 1:23:09 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> >> How about, in that case:
> >>
> >> 1: samples have an aggregating parent.
> >> > complicated enough :-) but I think it makes sense to me. I'll likely
> >> > ask
> >>
> >> for
> >>
> >> > some modifications but perhaps if you could start with updating the
> >> > demo such that a consumer initiates its own registration with the
> >> > OAuth
> >>
> >> server :
> >> > I can see at the moment an oauth provider is injected with some sample
> >> > consumer properties. I'm not sure what is the best way to do it : may
> >> > be
> >>
> >> the
> >>
> >> > server can return a registration form or the client can just push the
> >> > registration info itself.
> >> >
> >> > Overall I think it is a good progress indeed especially given the
> >>
> >> complexity
> >>
> >> > of the whole effort.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > thanks, Sergey
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Łukasz Moreń >> >
> >> >wrote:
> >> >> Hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >> I have managed to create two sample OAuth aplications:
> >> >> ordinary OAuth 1.0a client: http://www.oauthclient.appspot.com
> >> >> and authorization server that uses CXF OAuth module:
> >> >> http://www.cxfoauthserver.appspot.com
> >> >>
> >> >> Both sample applications and changes in oauth library are commited in
> >> >> sandbox.
> >> >>
> >> >> OAuth configuration in sample authorization server app looks a bit
> >> >> awfully but I think most of that can be hidden and done out of band.
> >> >> There is still some areas in specification not covered by
> >> >> implementation, so I would like to take care of that in next steps.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks in advance for some feedback.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> Lukasz
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
nding/port/service level. It's a straight
soap fault. Thus, if actions were enforced, the "real" fault that is sent
back on the wire would be lost due to the fault of enforcing the actions on
the fault that would not be there.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
ttp://weblogs.java.net/blog/jitu/archive/2010/07/09/grizzly-transport-usin
> g-jax-ws-22-http-spi [2]
> https://jax-ws-commons.dev.java.net/grizzly-httpspi/jaxws-grizzly-httpspi/i
> ndex.html
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
It's been a couple months since 2.2.9 so I'd like to do a 2.2.10 fairly
shortly. I was thinking doing it either next week sometime or early the
following week.
Any objections?If not, try to get in any changes ASAP. :-)
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
be
org.eclipse, not org.mortbay.The org.eclipse stuff doesn't wrapper the
org.mortbay, it replaces it.On trunk, we've updated to 7.x (and will
probably go to 8.x once 8.0 is released).
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
y the way
> attempts to get the connectionFactory from JNDI if it's currently null) to
> ensure it's been initialized.
>
> cheers, Sergey
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
;
>
> 301 Moved Permanently
>
> Moved Permanently
> The document has moved
> http://download.java.net/maven/1/org.apache.servicemix/poms/servicemix-pom-
> 2.pom here .
>
> Apache Server at maven-repository.dev.java.net Port 443
>
>
>
> Can someone please tell me how to resolve this issue?
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
2010 11:37:38 +0200
> From: Alessio Soldano
> To: Richard Opalka
> CC: Sergey Beryozkin , jbossws-dev
>
>
>
>
> OK Richard, thanks.
> Then you should probably send him an email and CC the cxf dev list.
> Thanks
> Alessio
>
> On 08/04/2010 10:
I had fixed all those a while
ago, apparently not.
Dan
On Thursday 05 August 2010 11:48:18 am Daniel Kulp wrote:
> The loadContextCatalogs is more of the "runtime" version that grabs the
> catalogs from the META-INF things at runtime.The loadCatalogs is more
> of a tool
Is everyone OK if I build 2.2.10 tomorrow sometime?
I meant to try and do it today, but I'm still trying to catch up from
everything that went on last week. Thus, I'm hoping to do it tomorrow.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
at
> org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:211) at
> org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:380) at
> org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:395
> ) at
> org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(BoundedThread
and ws-message reliability in cxf. So i
> don't want other web service endpoint of my existing web service. So how
> can i achieve this in glassfish ?
>
> Waiting for your reply
>
> Thanks in advance
> Darpan Desai
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
se which would be required for a bunch of
things. Thus, you'll need to create instances of those that forward into the
SPI things.
For the most part, if you can create an HttpServletRequest/Response, then a
subclass of AbstractHttpDestination would be pretty easy to create to do all
this.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
On Saturday 07 August 2010 3:41:15 am Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> On 07/22/2010 02:16 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 July 2010 5:19:42 pm Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> And in
> >> that case I assume
mpl.java:500) Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.cxf.binding.corba.runtime.CorbaStreamReader.getTextCharacters(Co
> rbaStreamReader.java:49) at
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.StAXStreamConnector.handleCharacte
> rs(StAXStreamConnector.java:323) at
> co
ugh.
Dan
> Thanks & Best Regards,
> Nilupa
>
>
>
> [1] http://github.com/nilupa/cxf/tree/trunk/rt/databinding/jibx/
> [2]
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=4C5CD68B.7070200%40
> sosnoski.com
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
should have been removed. Nothing
loads it.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
epos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.2.10
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
Here is my +1.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
With 9 +1 votes and no other votes, this vote passes. I'll get the artifacts
promoted.
Dan
On Thursday 12 August 2010 11:31:54 pm Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.2.9 release. Over 55
gt; adopting it? There turns out to be a university research project in Europe
> which is sad to see it heading for the mothballs.
Honestly, I've never looked at Muse enough to have an opinion one way or
another. I'm not even sure what it does. :-)
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apac
The Apache CXF team is proud to announce the availability of the latest
patch for the 2.2.x fixes branch: version 2.2.10
Apache CXF is an open source services framework. CXF helps you build and
develop services using front end programming APIs, like JAX-WS and JAX-RS.
These services can speak a
fault right now), but the artifacts would need to be resolvable
somehow.
Dan
On Wednesday 18 August 2010 8:52:25 am Nilupa Bandara wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Nilupa Bandara
>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >> On Th
On Wednesday 18 August 2010 1:38:29 pm Nilupa Bandara wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > Nilupa, (and Dennis)
> >
> > Are the jibx snapshot's available in a maven snapshot repo someplace? I
> > see
> > the latest releases are
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Nilupa Bandara
>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >> On Thursday 12 August 2010 9:46:51 am Nilupa Bandara wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I've updated the
Regards,
>
> Oracle logo.gif
>
> Edumudi Venkata Viswanath | Senior Consultant | +91 20 3984 7491 (O) |
> 9665045854 (M) Oracle Financial Services Software Limited | Ambrosia,
> Pune, India
>
>
>
> Oracle Financial Services Software Limited was formally i-flex solutions
> limited.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
-25 13:52:01 -0400 (Tue, 25 May 2010) | 1 line
Turn off DTD and Entity expansion stuff in the XMLStreamReaders
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
ot; address="/GetSoftInfoService"
> serviceName="st:GetSoftInfoService" endpointName="st:SoftInfoPortType"
> implementor="com.mycomp.service.provider.userservices.assets.st.x2005.Soft
> InfoPortTypeImpl">
> value="true
ing the MS
server is properly running and they didn't move things around again)
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
g/hudson/view/CXF/job/CXF-trunk-deploy/378/
although the Interopfest ones are not as they require the MS servers to be up
and running and such and I didn't want the builds failing due to that.
Dan
> cheers, Sergey
>
> > Glen
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/How-to-run-interopfest-tp2644543p2644543.
> > html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
erty("startServer", "true"))) {
> MyTest.runner = new StandAloneRunner(
> "classpath:server-context.xml");
> MyTest.runner.start();
> }
> }
>
> /**
> * Stops the server optionally started by
The Apache CXF team would like your input to help improve the CXF project!
We're conducting an anonymous survey to help us identify where our efforts are
best spent in supporting the community. We'd like to get a feel for who our
users really are, what features are currently heavily used, w
On Tuesday 24 August 2010 8:31:21 am Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 06:00 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > ...
> > So, to actually integrate it, we would need to either have it in a proper
> > maven 2 snapshot repo or get a usable release. That's obviously outside
Just a reminder to everyone that may have been out last week...
The Apache CXF team would like your input to help improve the CXF project!
We're conducting an anonymous survey to help us identify where our efforts
are best spent in supporting the community. We'd like to get a feel for
who ou
hat CXF didn't fabricate enough
> schema. Yet calls to the service work right.
>
> It seems to me that these severe log messages can't possibly be what
> we want. We want a single WARN level message that says, 'no wsdl, you
> idiots, you may have problems.'
>
> I'd like to work on the code here, and also on the text on Confluence.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
see an example showing the
> > cast to a concrete class.
> > In both cases I've seen the service mode being set to PAYLOAD.
> >
> > Can someone please clarify when exactly should the cast be done to
> > JAXBElement as opposed to a concrete class ?
> >
> > thanks, Sergey
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
policy.Ass
> ertionBuilderRegistry,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyInterceptorProviderReg
> istry,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.attachment.external.DomainExpressionBuilderR
> egistry,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.attachment.external.EndpointReferenceDomai
> nExpressionBuilder,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyBuilder,org.apache.cxf.ws
> .policy.PolicyEngine,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.attachment.wsdl11.Wsdl11Attac
> hmentPolicyProvider,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.attachment.ServiceModelPolicyP
> rovider,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.mtom.MTOMAssertionBuilder,org.apache.cxf.w
> s.policy.mtom.MTOMPolicyInterceptorProvider,org.apache.cxf.ws.security.poli
> cy.WSSecurityPolicyLoader]; root of factory hierarchy
> [INFO]
>
> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Could not find any node with the XPath expression:
> //wsdl:definitions
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
mple may need some updates for 2.3. With the soap/jms spec support, it
may be best to update the sample to use the soap/jms spec stuff instead of the
proprietary extensors and such.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
pcInInterceptor - but may be parts are created dynamically there
I'll take a look at the RpcInInterceptor. It may be a relic from before we
were sending the message into the Reader/Writers. At one point, we didn't
have the setProperty method on them and the only way to get informatio
rtunately, that would completely change the semantics of the API
and would require some good docs for the migration guide.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
the response at all, fault or not. But I really think it's a relatively
bogus use case so your fix is fine by me.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
ions and tests which are ready to go.
> ProviderImpl is just checked if wsdlLocation, serviceName, interfaceName
> and metadata list are all null and if yes then no Metadata is added...Any
> concerns - let me know
>
>
> cheers, Sergey
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
y required. There are ways you can configure in the XMLInputFactory
from Spring that can avoid the CorrectingStaxInInterceptor, but that can also
be a bit complex.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
The Apache CXF team would like your input to help improve the CXF project!
We're planning on closing the survey soon, so if you haven't yet filled out
the survey, please do so!
We're conducting an anonymous survey to help us identify where our efforts
are best spent in supporting the communit
unctions in here. Absent
> objections, I will remove questionable functions which are never called.
Please do.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
t 100% positive though.
On Wednesday 08 September 2010 10:02:50 am Willem Jiang wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 September 2010 9:32:46 am Willem Jiang wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I just did some work to let the camel-cxf leverage the C
7;t anything on the client to
mark it as "finished". For CXF, you can try:
org.apache.cxf.frontend.ClientProxy.getClient(client).destroy();
If that doesn't work, please log a bug. That should call close() on the
conduit which should completely cleanup it's connections and such.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
>>> how the Servlet 3 things work. Unfortunately, that would completely
> >>> change the semantics of the API and would require some good docs for
> >>> the migration guide.
> >>
> >> I don't think this is a good idea, if we can't support to the
> >> continuation API from the transport level, we simple don't let the user
> >> can get the ContinuationProvider from the message context.
> >>
> >> It could be much easier for user to use :)
> >>
> >> [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2982
> >>
> >> Willem
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
sions that have fixes in place that we need.
Anyway, wanted everyone to know about it and possibly take a look and maybe
even help out. If we get it all working, it could definitely help with the
scalability of the CXF/Camel and SMX integrations.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
="{http://cxf.apache.org/jms_greeter}GreeterPort.jms-destination";>
> >>>> >>>> destinationStyle="queue"
> >>>> jndiConnectionFactoryName="ConnectionFactory"
> >>>> jndiDestinationName="queue/RequestQueue"
> >>>> jndiReplyDestinationName="queue/ResponseQueue">
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> name="{http://cxf.apache.org/jms_greeter}GreeterPort..jms-conduit";>
> >>>> >>>> destinationStyle="queue"
> >>>> jndiConnectionFactoryName="ConnectionFactory"
> >>>> jndiDestinationName="queue/RequestQueue"
> >>>> jndiReplyDestinationName="queue/ResponseQueue">
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---Client code ---
> >>>> String reqMessage =" >>>> xmlns:env='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/'>... >>>> e>";
> >>>>
> >>>> InitialContext context = new InitialContext();
> >>>> QueueConnectionFactory connectionFactory
> >>>> (QueueConnectionFactory)context.lookup("ConnectionFactory");
> >>>> Queue reqQueue = (Queue)context.lookup("queue/RequestQueue");
> >>>> Queue resQueue = (Queue)context.lookup("queue/ResponseQueue");
> >>>> QueueConnection con = connectionFactory.createQueueConnection();
> >>>> QueueSession session = con.createQueueSession(false,
> >>>> Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
> >>>> QueueReceiver receiver = session.createReceiver(resQueue);
> >>>> ResponseListener responseListener = new ResponseListener();
> >>>> receiver.setMessageListener(responseListener);
> >>>> con.start();
> >>>>
> >>>> TextMessage message = session.createTextMessage(reqMessage);
> >>>> message.setJMSReplyTo(resQueue);
> >>>> waitForResponse = true;
> >>>> QueueSender sender = session.createSender(reqQueue);
> >>>> sender.send(message);
> >>>> sender.close();
> >>>> int timeout = 5;
> >>>> while (waitForResponse&& timeout> 0)
> >>>> {
> >>>> Thread.sleep(1000);
> >>>> timeout = timeout -1;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Jim
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
e.
> What policy do we have for situations like this, if any ? Can I just add
> the java.net repo, or should we try to find out if we can have those
> artifacts pushed to central?
> It would be really nice to keep those tests enabled..
> Cheers
> Alessio
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 8:58:27 pm Willem Jiang wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> On 9/14/10 11:06 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 8:47:34 am Willem Jiang wrote:
> >> On 9/14/10 4:16 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
> >> After checking the change log and
etty much be ignored. That's why the methods were not
exposed. Technically, once started, the contents of the list could be
completely discarded.
If we wanted to support a public API for adding features like that, it would
need to actually apply the feature on the add. Not sure what could be done
dImpl();
> JaxWsServerFactoryBean svrFactory = new JaxWsServerFactoryBean();
> svrFactory.setServiceClass(HelloWorld.class);
> svrFactory.setAddress("jms://");
> svrFactory.setServiceBean(implementor);
> svrFactory.create();
>
> System.out.println("Server ready... Press any key to exit");
> System.in.read();
> System.out.println("Server exiting");
> System.exit(0);
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
he packaging issues are the main thing that need to
be finalized. Hopefully not too major.
Thoughts?
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
tools" and moving the command
line tooling things into there. Thus, the bundle would be more just the
runtime parts. Thoughts?
Another quick question: are there docs for the validation things above or the
management-web? There isn't for SDO so I'll add that to my todo as we
t as well. :-)
Dan
On Friday 17 September 2010 10:43:04 am Daniel Kulp wrote:
> We've now challenged the last few remaining JAX-RS 1.1 tests. We're
> waiting to see if the challenge is accepted or not (and it's going to be
> slow due to JavaOne), but that pretty much mea
t;/"true" for Aegis?
If so, that's definitely valuable and something to list in the new features
and make sure it's included.
Dan
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > There are some jars and such on trunk that we are building and using
> &g
nal from confluence:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF20DOC/SOAP+over+JMS+1.0+support
Dan
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > r-jms-10-support.html
> >
> > It would be GOOD to update the java_first_jms sample to use the new
>
at the moment, management-web has only atom pull/push related code and it
>
> was originally documented (and later expanded) on the jaxrs page.
Well, that page is another whole discussion point. :-) Almost too big to
find much in it.
> Tomasz
> has started documenting his bro
d, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 September 2010 2:33:47 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> >> This is from the java_first_jms sample that I cleaned up. Why is the URL
> >> in the server factory trivial? Why doesn't it need to state the host
t; tionFactory(JMSConfiguration.java:441) at
> >>>>
> >>>> org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.JMSConfiguration.ensureProperlyConfigured
> >>>> (JMSConfiguration.java:104) at
> >>>>
> >>>> org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.JMSDestination.activate(JMSDestination.ja
> >>>> va:111) at
> >>>>
> >>>> org.apache.cxf.transport.AbstractObservable.setMessageObserver(Abstrac
> >>>> tObservable.java:48) at
> >>>>
> >>>> org.apache.cxf.binding.AbstractBindingFactory.addListener(AbstractBind
> >>>> ingFactory.java:181) at
> >>>>
> >>>> org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.SoapBindingFactory.addListener(SoapBinding
> >>>> Factory.java:835) at
> >>>> org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ServerImpl.start(ServerImpl.java:127) at
> >>>>
> >>>> org.apache.cxf.frontend.ServerFactoryBean.create(ServerFactoryBean.jav
> >>>> a:186) at
> >>>>
> >>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.JaxWsServerFactoryBean.create(JaxWsServerFactoryB
> >>>> ean.java:183) at demo.server.ServerJMS.main(ServerJMS.java:63)
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.liquid-reality.de
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
r to load things and DOESN'T
set the context classloader like they should. I think that is the issue you
are seeing with OO. They create their own URLClassLoader or something to
load the CXF jars and such, but fail to set the context classloader to that
classloader.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk
; >
> > BTW, I don't think we need the ClientHTTP.java and ServerHTTP.java any
> > more, so I'm planing to remove them.
> >
> > Willem
> >
> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >>> On Sunday 19 September 2010 7:20:1
#x27;ll try an take a look. Something is definitely strange, at least on trunk.
I did a wireshark trace on a decoupled ws-a case and saw some strange things.
A ack in a 202 (instead of 200) along with the client sending an 200 with an
empty body back for the real response.
--
Daniel
p to edit
the wiki.
> I will try to implement them in this order.
>
> Please let me know if you have any other ideas/suggestions for that.
That all sounds great to me. :-)
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
of address to the endpoint.publish call so
we historically just stick in "jms://" in there to make JAX-WS happy. :-) If
you try something like enpoint.publish(null), you have to cast the null to
resolve the overloaded publish. Nothing major.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
hort term though as I know a bunch of folks are using the old
things.
Dan
>
> Regards
>
> Christian
>
> Am 23.09.2010 16:12, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> > On Monday 20 September 2010 8:22:07 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> >> I'm not sure what, if anything, to do
receives a response message. "Asynchronous" in
> this context refers to the manner in which the underlying transport
> protocol is used to carry the request and response messages. The
> response message is sent over a separate connection that is initiated by
> the service to the client (a "callback")."
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
TTPUrlConnection. Which I'm not sure is the right approach, I'd rather
> prefer to delegate to CXF and let it deal with buffering the message and
> get the length, etc, as it would probably make the inclusion of such the
> factory a more real possibility.
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> cheers, Sergey
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
"/>
> minOccurs="0" name="periods"
> type="impl:PeriodsForGetBillingPeriodRange"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>name="getBillingPeriodRangeResponse"/>
>
>
>
>name="getBillingPeriodRangeRequest"/>
>
>
>
>parameterOrder="getBillingPeriodRangeRequest">
>message="impl:manageGetBillingPeriodRangeRequest"
> name="manageGetBillingPeriodRangeRequest"/>
>message="impl:manageGetBillingPeriodRangeResponse"
> name="manageGetBillingPeriodRangeResponse"/>
>
>
>
>type="impl:GetBillingPeriodRange">
>transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>name="GetBillingPeriodRange">
>location="http://10.101.4.93:9013/SF_G4R6/services/GetBillingPeriodRange"/>
>
>
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
401 - 500 of 2147 matches
Mail list logo
