Due to the discovered regressions, I'm cancelling this vote. I'll create
an rc2 once the issues are resolved.
On 2023-10-23 12:14 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.6.0-rc1.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can
My vote -1
Too many regressions. Existing schemas need to keep working if at all
possible.
I think the issue of properties having whitespace e.g., dfdlx:repValues="0
" breaking due to the trailing space is a blocker. If that was tolerated
before, it needs to be tolerated forever.
I think the
It may be worth fixing.
Sincerely,
Harinder Sood
Senior Program Manager
hs...@owlcyberdefense.com
240 805 4219
owlcyberdefense.com
The information contained in this transmission is for the personal and
confidential use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the
I've found two issues related to dfdlx:repType while regression testing
this release:
* DAFFODIL-2855: Scoping different when using dfldx:repType vs type
* DAFFODIL-2857: Different prefixes for same namespace fails to compile
with dfdlx:repType
Although 2855 causes regressions, it does have
