These issues have been addressed, and the rest will be addressed after
the release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2305
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2302
The Sonarqube required more work than anticipated and we didn't want to
hold up the release for it.
I'll
up in this same schema again even
>>>> after the fix which supposedly addressed it. So I think the fix solved
>>>> some, but not all of this problem. I will try to recreate this and reopen
>>>> the ticket if it is still happening.
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to
up in this same schema again even
>>>> after the fix which supposedly addressed it. So I think the fix solved
>>>> some, but not all of this problem. I will try to recreate this and reopen
>>>> the ticket if it is still happening.
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to
er the fix which supposedly addressed it. So I think the fix solved
>>> some, but not all of this problem. I will try to recreate this and reopen
>>> the ticket if it is still happening.
>>>
>>> I don't want to manage the release, but I definitely think i
s better if it
>> isn't Steve L., ... I could have my arm twisted.
>>
>> From: Steve Lawrence
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 3:12 PM
>> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.6.0 Release
>>
FODIL-2293 in the release 2.6.0.
>
> Is there already a release date announced?
>
> Thanks & best regards,
> Kurt
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Steve Lawrence
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. März 2020 20:13
> An: dev@daffodil.apache.org
> Betreff: [DIS
März 2020 20:13
An: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.6.0 Release
With the last of the changes recently merged to support improved schema
compilation speed and memory, I think now is a good time to start discussing
the next release.
1) Does anyone have any changes that are c
reopen the
> ticket if it is still happening.
>
> I don't want to manage the release, but I definitely think it's better if it
> isn't Steve L., ... I could have my arm twisted.
>
> From: Steve Lawrence
> Sent: Wednesday, March 2
3:12 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.6.0 Release
With the last of the changes recently merged to support improved schema
compilation speed and memory, I think now is a good time to start
discussing the next release.
1) Does anyone have any changes that are close to being r
initely think it's better if it
isn't Steve L., ... I could have my arm twisted.
From: Steve Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 3:12 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.6.0 Release
With the last of the changes recentl
With the last of the changes recently merged to support improved schema
compilation speed and memory, I think now is a good time to start
discussing the next release.
1) Does anyone have any changes that are close to being ready to merge
or bugs that are worth delaying the next release until resol
11 matches
Mail list logo
