day, October 21, 2019 10:16 AM
>> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] comm...@daffodil.apache.org
>>
>> Seems perfectly reasonable to me. All the PRs and comments definitely
>> get a bit overwhelming and can hide actual discussions. We already have
>>
gt; +1 from me.
>
> From: Steve Lawrence
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 10:16 AM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] comm...@daffodil.apache.org
>
> Seems perfectly reasonable to me. All the PRs and comments definitely
> get a bit overwhelming and can hide a
Reserving dev for topical discussions from developers seems wise. Robot-created
emails should always be separable.
+1 from me.
From: Steve Lawrence
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 10:16 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] comm
Seems perfectly reasonable to me. All the PRs and comments definitely
get a bit overwhelming and can hide actual discussions. We already have
a commits@ list but only commits go there. Makes sense to send all other
commit related stuff there as well.
+1 from me
On 10/21/19 7:13 AM, Julian Feinau
Hi folks,
I follow the Daffodil ML since a while now but I already recognized that its
extremly “noisy” with tons of reports about commits, PRs, Comments and so on.
At PLC4X we added an additional list commits@... Where we send all those things
(and where PMC and Committers should be subscribed)
