Due to the discovered regressions, I'm cancelling this vote. I'll create
an rc2 once the issues are resolved.
On 2023-10-23 12:14 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.6.0-rc1.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can
My vote -1
Too many regressions. Existing schemas need to keep working if at all
possible.
I think the issue of properties having whitespace e.g., dfdlx:repValues="0
" breaking due to the trailing space is a blocker. If that was tolerated
before, it needs to be tolerated forever.
I think the
: Thursday, October 26, 2023 12:26 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.6.0-rc1
I've found two issues related to dfdlx:repType while regression testing this
release:
* DAFFODIL-2855: Scoping different when using dfldx:repType vs type
* DAFFODIL-2857: Different
I've found two issues related to dfdlx:repType while regression testing
this release:
* DAFFODIL-2855: Scoping different when using dfldx:repType vs type
* DAFFODIL-2857: Different prefixes for same namespace fails to compile
with dfdlx:repType
Although 2855 causes regressions, it does have
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.6.0-rc1.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.6.0-rc1/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
