Re: M.services vs META-INF/services directories

2024-03-09 Thread Mike Beckerle
Egad. Yes, that is it. On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 5:11 PM Steve Lawrence wrote: > Could this be some kind of IDE display thing, like it's shortening > META-INF/services to M.services in a display to save a few characters, but > behind the scenes it's still META-INF/services? > > On 2024-03-09

Re: M.services vs META-INF/services directories

2024-03-09 Thread Steve Lawrence
Could this be some kind of IDE display thing, like it's shortening META-INF/services to M.services in a display to save a few characters, but behind the scenes it's still META-INF/services? On 2024-03-09 02:59 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote: Does anyone know why Daffodil searches for the files that

M.services vs META-INF/services directories

2024-03-09 Thread Mike Beckerle
Does anyone know why Daffodil searches for the files that advertise SPI services for layers, charsets, and validators under resources/M.services instead of the standard resources/META-INF/services directory, as is used by the UDF SPI services? The code base doesn't contain the string "M.services"