On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 08:51 -0400, Chuck wrote:
> Just thought I post a message here to see if anyone on the
> dbaneedsconfirm list is reading. I opened issue 52451 several months ago
> and it's still in unconfirmed state. I am wondering if anyone is even
> looking at OOo 2.0 database issues. IMO t
Am Freitag, den 21.10.2005, 19:57 +0200 schrieb Alex Thurgood:
> As a member of OOoQA I have trawled through some of the issues in dba,
> but there are many db engines to which I simply do not have access.
> Oracle is but one of them.
For the tough guys there is still this:
http://www.oracle.com
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2005 à 08:51 -0400, Chuck a écrit :
> Just thought I post a message here to see if anyone on the
> dbaneedsconfirm list is reading. I opened issue 52451 several months ago
> and it's still in unconfirmed state. I am wondering if anyone is even
> looking at OOo 2.0 database is
Just thought I post a message here to see if anyone on the
dbaneedsconfirm list is reading. I opened issue 52451 several months ago
and it's still in unconfirmed state. I am wondering if anyone is even
looking at OOo 2.0 database issues. IMO the issue is too visible to be
ignoring at the RC level a
