Moin Terrence,
Terrence Enger wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 16:37 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
Digging around on the web, I found Technical Standard, Data
Management: SQL Call Level Interafce (CLI)
http://www.opengroup.org/pubs/catalog/c451.htm.
Greetings,
I have pressed on with the
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 16:37 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
Digging around on the web, I found Technical Standard, Data
Management: SQL Call Level Interafce (CLI)
http://www.opengroup.org/pubs/catalog/c451.htm.
Greetings,
I have pressed on with the notion of retrieving the character
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 22:04 +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany
wrote:
Hi Terrence,
Where did the multiplcation by 1000 come from? And is there some
context in which it is the right thing to do? Which leads to further
questions ...
In general, I assume there might be
I am responding only to one of Frank's points now. The others require
actual thought.
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 22:04 +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems
Germany wrote:
Another problem with your patch is that it is not complete: There is no
DateTimeToTimestamp which takes a
Hi Terrence,
Ocke would be better to answer (most of) your questions, since a) I'm no
active Base developer anymore :) and b) the ODBC driver is his domain.
But since he's on vacation currently, let me jump in.
(*) I am not satisfied with my analysis of the impact of the change.
For me to
Greetings,
I have just added a patch and some test data and results to issue
94543 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94543. Points
arising ...
(*) I am not satisfied with my analysis of the impact of the change.
For me to make any progress on this, I think I shall have to