Hi Caolán,
> What I'm finding kind of hard though to find out though is if jdbc
> drivers should only be assumed to support setting primary keys if
> supportsCoreSQLGrammar is enabled and OOo is totally correct in what it
> does, and its a matter for postgres-jdbc to support it to get this to
> wo
I see that if a JDBC driver returns false for supportsCoreSQLGrammar
then we don't provide any primary key setting support in base's UI.
One example is the postgres-jdbc driver which returns false for that
(but true for supportsANSI92EntryLevelSQL and for
supportsMinimumSQLGrammar). As a quick te
