Lets continue the discussion here. I got this email at my 6AM. I was
planning to take a look at the code and refresh my memory before
replying and I can do that while I am at home only. That is why it
took some time to reply. Next time please allow me sometime to reply
to your emails.
First thing
Some more clarifications about the changes :
when we write a LogEdit, we have two cases :
1) we write a ChangeDataContainer
2) we write a Transaction state
In the first case, we serialize the data in the log( LogEdit, sync)
method using the current transaction logRecord, then we call the log(
Le 3/14/12 11:56 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 3/14/12 11:32 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
Le 3/14/12 10:52 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
HI All,
Sorry for the earlier email. I think I
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 3/14/12 11:32 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 3/14/12 10:52 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
>>>
HI All,
Sorry for the earlier email. I think I owe some explainat
Le 3/14/12 11:32 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 3/14/12 10:52 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
HI All,
Sorry for the earlier email. I think I owe some explaination on my
part. The reason for my request is purely technical, does not aim at
oss spi
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 3/14/12 10:52 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
>
>> HI All,
>> Sorry for the earlier email. I think I owe some explaination on my
>> part. The reason for my request is purely technical, does not aim at
>> oss spirit or any other spirit for tha
Le 3/14/12 10:52 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
HI All,
Sorry for the earlier email. I think I owe some explaination on my
part. The reason for my request is purely technical, does not aim at
oss spirit or any other spirit for that matter:
* There are quite a number of files the txn branch is touching.
Le 3/14/12 10:48 PM, Alex Karasulu a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Kiran Ayyagariwrote:
Selcuk,
I have seen you asking several times on this list for reverting commits,
this seems to be a bit derogatory in OSS spirit and team work.
It can certainly be misinterpreted this
HI All,
Sorry for the earlier email. I think I owe some explaination on my
part. The reason for my request is purely technical, does not aim at
oss spirit or any other spirit for that matter:
* There are quite a number of files the txn branch is touching.
* There is no file ownership or review proc
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
> Selcuk,
>
>I have seen you asking several times on this list for reverting commits,
>this seems to be a bit derogatory in OSS spirit and team work.
>
It can certainly be misinterpreted this way. I think we just need more
communicat
Selcuk,
I have seen you asking several times on this list for reverting commits,
this seems to be a bit derogatory in OSS spirit and team work.
Go ahead and make your changes on top of these if you wish to apply
your fix, commits need not be reverted for this.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012
please revert this commit.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06 PM, wrote:
> Author: elecharny
> Date: Wed Mar 14 19:06:17 2012
> New Revision: 1300690
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1300690&view=rev
> Log:
> o Added a type for LogEdit stored into UserLogRecord, in order to be able to
> rea
We already have code to read log records and we do not need a type in
log edits. We do not call this yet as we do not do crash recovery yet.
I saw you already committed some changes for this without waiting for
a reply. Please revert your latest commit.
thanks
Selcuk
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:10
Hi,
as i'm reviewing the way we manage the WAL (Write Ahead Log), I have a
few questions :
1) UserLogRecord
It's a data structure encapsulating an opaque byte[] containing a
serialized form of a record. We have two length, the serialized data
length, and the buffer length (which might be wi
14 matches
Mail list logo
