[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-149:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.0-M32)
1.0.0-M33
> LdapNetworkConnection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-179:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.0-M32)
1.0.0-M33
> Referral Hop Count
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-222:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.0-M32)
1.0.0-M33
> Make the LdifReader
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-154:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.0-M32)
1.0.0-M33
> Implement "online"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-216:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.0-M32)
1.0.0-M33
> Improvements in OSGi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-256:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.0-M32)
1.0.0-M33
> We need to implement
Le 19/10/15 20:58, Stefan Seelmann a écrit :
> On 10/19/2015 11:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>> OTOH, using the before(K)/after(K), it's easier :
>>
>> getting the previous key
>>
>>
>> tuple = before(K);
>>
>> getting the next key
>>
>>
>> tuple =
Javier Diaz created DIRSTUDIO-1072:
--
Summary: Problem updating Directory Studio in Eclipse Mars
Key: DIRSTUDIO-1072
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-1072
Project: Directory Studio
Hi,
On 10/20/2015 09:08 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
I just saw that you have added the control you needed. That was fast !
Actually I had most of the code done on Sunday evening and tested it on
Monday. I've only delayed the commit because of the release ...
When you need to have AD
Hi Radovan,
I just saw that you have added the control you needed. That was fast !
I have created the associated JIRA :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-258, feel free to close it.
Looking at the code, I wonder if the following methods are useful in the
AdShawDeletedImpl class :
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Radovan Semancik resolved DIRAPI-258.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Add support for the Microsoft LDAP server show deleted objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-258:
-
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: New Feature)
Parent: DIRAPI-259
> Add support for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-259:
-
Description:
There are many Microsoft AD controls an extended operations we don't yet
Hi,
Today I realized that there are some quite unusual OIDs out there, such as:
2.25.81407072025111374527560065493494091452
This is in fact UUID in an OID form, as specified in ITU-T X.667. The
trouble is that the API seems to assume that each OID arc can fit into
Java long
Emmanuel Lecharny created DIRAPI-258:
Summary: Add support for the Microsoft LDAP server show deleted
objects control
Key: DIRAPI-258
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-258
Emmanuel Lecharny created DIRAPI-259:
Summary: Add support for some missing Microsoft AD controls and
extended operations
Key: DIRAPI-259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-259
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-259:
-
Description:
There are many Microsoft AD controls an extended operations we don't yet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-1072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965460#comment-14965460
]
Stefan Seelmann commented on DIRSTUDIO-1072:
I just tried myself with same environment
Le 20/10/15 21:24, Radovan Semancik a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 10/20/2015 09:08 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>> I just saw that you have added the control you needed. That was fast !
>
> Actually I had most of the code done on Sunday evening and tested it
> on Monday. I've only delayed the commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-1072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Seelmann updated DIRSTUDIO-1072:
---
Attachment: screenshot2.png
screenshot1.png
> Problem updating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-259:
-
Description:
There are many Microsoft AD controls an extended operations we don't yet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-259:
-
Description:
There are many Microsoft AD controls an extended operations we don't yet
Le 20/10/15 19:10, Pierre Smits a écrit :
> Regarding managing user expectations with respect to API and DS working
> with AD is to register a JIRA issue for each of the not working controls.
> The advantages are that both users and community members would then now
> where the products stand.
>
>
Julia Smith created DIR-320:
---
Summary: ACL/ACI documentation section missing, filled with TODOs.
Key: DIR-320
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-320
Project: Directory
Issue Type:
Regarding managing user expectations with respect to API and DS working
with AD is to register a JIRA issue for each of the not working controls.
The advantages are that both users and community members would then now
where the products stand.
And if and when one gets fixed it'll turn up in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965304#comment-14965304
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIR-320:
---
Yes, that's very true, and we are truly sorry for that :/
The
Le 20/10/15 21:33, Radovan Semancik a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Today I realized that there are some quite unusual OIDs out there,
> such as:
>
> 2.25.81407072025111374527560065493494091452
>
> This is in fact UUID in an OID form, as specified in ITU-T X.667. The
> trouble is that the API seems to assume
27 matches
Mail list logo
