Re: [VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.1 release

2018-07-09 Thread Shawn McKinney
> On Jul 9, 2018, at 3:07 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > Two findings: > > * Selenium is now included in fortress-web as runtime dependency, I > guess it is only requried as test dependency? License wise that's fine > and not a blocker because it uses Apache License. However it increases > the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.1 release

2018-07-09 Thread Stefan Seelmann
Two findings: * Selenium is now included in fortress-web as runtime dependency, I guess it is only requried as test dependency? License wise that's fine and not a blocker because it uses Apache License. However it increases the WAR file size from 26MB to 34MB and adds many more libs which may incr

[VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.1 release

2018-07-09 Thread Shawn McKinney
Hello, I’m happy to announce that after a year’s worth of work we’ve managed to put together a new release. Just to set expectations, it won’t be another before the next one. There are some interesting items that need out. Yudhi’s High availability being one of them. Also I should mention a

Register now for ApacheCon and save $250

2018-07-09 Thread Rich Bowen
Greetings, Apache software enthusiasts! (You’re getting this because you’re on one or more dev@ or users@ lists for some Apache Software Foundation project.) ApacheCon North America, in Montreal, is now just 80 days away, and early bird prices end in just two weeks - on July 21. Prices will b

Re: LDAP 2.0 and beyond, was : Re: SCIMple, current state of Apache LDAP 2.0, and Java 9/10/11

2018-07-09 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 09/07/2018 à 15:28, Radovan Semancik a écrit : >> One last solution : pass a flag (like 'MUTE_WARNINGS') to the API while >> processing a schema, and have something like : >> >> if ( LOG.isWarnEnabled() && !muteWarnings ) >> { >> LOG.warn( msg ); >>

Re: LDAP 2.0 and beyond, was : Re: SCIMple, current state of Apache LDAP 2.0, and Java 9/10/11

2018-07-09 Thread Radovan Semancik
On 07/09/2018 02:54 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: I guess most of the errors are produced by the DefaultSchemaObjectRegistry class. If so, I wonder if a more simple solution would'nt be to create a specific Logger for such a thing as AD, and configure the property file to mute the other loggers.

LDAP 2.0 and beyond, was : Re: SCIMple, current state of Apache LDAP 2.0, and Java 9/10/11

2018-07-09 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 09/07/2018 à 13:46, Radovan Semancik a écrit : > Hi, > > On 07/01/2018 09:40 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> Otherwise, the APache LDAP API 2.0 is on its way, I have fixed a long >> lasting ticket about reshuffling the error/messages numbering - quite a >> pain in the back...- and I still hav

[jira] [Resolved] (FC-235) Add support for runtime constraints to be placed on activated roles

2018-07-09 Thread Shawn McKinney (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FC-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn McKinney resolved FC-235. --- Resolution: Fixed > Add support for runtime constraints to be placed on activated roles > ---

[jira] [Resolved] (FC-108) Add support for RFC2307 BIS

2018-07-09 Thread Shawn McKinney (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FC-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn McKinney resolved FC-108. --- Resolution: Fixed > Add support for RFC2307 BIS > --- > > Key: FC

Re: SCIMple, current state of Apache LDAP 2.0, and Java 9/10/11

2018-07-09 Thread Radovan Semancik
Hi, On 07/01/2018 09:40 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: Otherwise, the APache LDAP API 2.0 is on its way, I have fixed a long lasting ticket about reshuffling the error/messages numbering - quite a pain in the back...- and I still have a pending issue in ApacheDS with this revision : one failing te