FYI: the different hash algorithms in CycloneDX SBOM is due to Azul JDK 8 vs
other JDK 8 distributions
Azul backported to JDK 8 newer hash algorithms from JDK 11, and
cyclonedx-maven-plugin uses by default every hash algorithm available on the JVM
for the record, checking binaries during a vote
Thanks Colm!
I haven't included your vote in the release mail, but that was short ;-)
Many thanks for the vote though, it's valuable!
On 06/02/2024 09:30, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
+1 from me.
Colm.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:56 AM Brian Demers wrote:
+1 - Binding
I checked
Hi!
I add my +1 to the release vote.
I therefore close the vote with 3 binding +1:
- Brian
- Shawn
- and me.
I'll close the release and push the packages.
Many thanks!
On 01/02/2024 23:52, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.6
ething environment
> specific happening, but that's not a blocker for release (and I'm guessing
> it's user error)
> Also validated source zip was signed by a key in the KEYS file
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:52 PM Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
error)
Also validated source zip was signed by a key in the KEYS file
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:52 PM Emmanuel Lecharny
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.6
>
> This release is fixing a DSML search filter serialization issue.
>
> The r
On 01/02/2024 23:52, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.6
This release is fixing a DSML search filter serialization issue.
The revision :
https://github.com/apache/directory-ldap-api/tree/c4d1a83b712bacf24c36f9fe5eacde330eff9a81
+ 1, built source, ran w/ Fortress integration tests. Looks good.
> On Feb 1, 2024, at 4:52 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.6
>
> This release is fixing a DSML search filter serialization issue.
>
>
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.6
This release is fixing a DSML search filter serialization issue.
The revision :
https://github.com/apache/directory-ldap-api/tree/c4d1a83b712bacf24c36f9fe5eacde330eff9a81
The source and binary distribution packages:
https
Hi!
sorry for the missed vote :/
I just got out from a week at the hospital, and wasn"'t allowed by my
wife to touch a coimputer for an extra week...
I'm now back and kicking !
On 18/01/2024 00:59, Brian Demers wrote:
The vote to accept SCIMple 1.0.0-M1 passed with 3 +1 PMC [binding]
The vote to accept SCIMple 1.0.0-M1 passed with 3 +1 PMC [binding]
votes and no dissenting votes:
+1 Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1 Shawn McKinney
+1 Brian Demers
And 1 non-binding vote:
+1 Eran Toledano
Thanks to all who voted!
I'll promote the staged artifacts and send out the announcement emails
+1 from me
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 1:21 PM Shawn McKinney wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 16, 2024, at 4:09 PM, Brian Demers wrote:
> >
> > Hey All!
> >
> > Great questions added by Shawn!
> >
> > Hopefully I hit them all:
> >
> >> Guide to testing staged releases:
> >>
> On Jan 16, 2024, at 4:09 PM, Brian Demers wrote:
>
> Hey All!
>
> Great questions added by Shawn!
>
> Hopefully I hit them all:
>
>> Guide to testing staged releases:
>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
>
> This is optional, _techniall_ this is a
Hi,
+1 from me. I've built the code, checked the signature, run the tests.
A "Getting Started" page would be good for new users, maybe a sample
project, if it doesn't exist already.
Colm.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:10 PM Brian Demers wrote:
>
> Hey All!
>
> Great questions added by Shawn!
>
>
Hey All!
Great questions added by Shawn!
Hopefully I hit them all:
> Guide to testing staged releases:
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
This is optional, _techniall_ this is a guide explaining how to test
the convenience binaries that will be deployed to
> On Jan 14, 2024, at 10:03 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote:
>
> Disregard the dumb question. Pulled down the source, built, ran tests in the
> usual way.
>
> Have another dumb question - will there be a binary distribution?
Err, dist outside of maven central repo, i.e. via apache mirrors.
> On Jan 14, 2024, at 9:03 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Usually when testing a release I’ll create a VM and delete it when finished.
>
> So, I don’t care about such things as clearing out repos.
>
> So, I’m confused reading the testing release guides directions to change
> On Jan 9, 2024, at 5:09 PM, Brian Demers wrote:
>
> This is a call to vote in favor of releasing Apache Directory SCIMple
> version 1.0.0-M1.
>
> This is the initial release since moving the project from
> https://github.com/PennState/SCIMple-Identity to the Apache
This is a call to vote in favor of releasing Apache Directory SCIMple
version 1.0.0-M1.
This is the initial release since moving the project from
https://github.com/PennState/SCIMple-Identity to the Apache Software
Foundation: https://github.com/apache/directory-scimple
Maven Staging Repo:
https
>
Very nice.
>
> ## Release Issues
> I don't anticipate any more show stoppers as to getting the release
> out, but I'm guessing there will be a few minor tweaks along the way
>
>
> ## Voting on the Release!
>
> Given the holidays are in full swing, we need to make
can try to cut the release today/tomorrow, that ends the vote
about on Dec 23
- Stage the release today/tomorrow, allow for extended feedback
period, and vall the vote the first week of 2024
- Wait for the release until 2024
My thinking is option 2 might be the best bet, gets the process
started
Hi!
I therefore close this vote, completed with 3 bidning +1:
- Colm
- Shawn
- and me.
Many thanks for the votes!
PS: We really need to assess the status of the other PMC members. With 3
votes in the past releases, we are on the hedge of not being able to cut
a release.
On 14/10/2023 16:57
So it seems that those two mails have been deleted from my mail box.
I was pretty sure I saw them, but in doubt, I preferred to bug you guys ;-)
Thanks a lot, I will close the vote and push the packages !
On 20/10/2023 14:36, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
If there is any doubt, it's +1 from me
the implicit mine ;-)
> >
> > You wrote that you are "still testing" and Colm was waiting for the
> > installer to be moved to dist.
> >
> > That's why I can't close the vote...
> >
>
> But later (Oct 17) I voted[1] +1 and replied to Colm’s[2].
>
> On Oct 20, 2023, at 6:59 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
> sorry, but there is no official +1 (beside the implicit mine ;-)
>
> You wrote that you are "still testing" and Colm was waiting for the
> installer to be moved to dist.
>
Hi Shawn,
sorry, but there is no official +1 (beside the implicit mine ;-)
You wrote that you are "still testing" and Colm was waiting for the
installer to be moved to dist.
That's why I can't close the vote...
On 20/10/2023 13:05, Shawn McKinney wrote:
On Oct 19, 2023, a
> On Oct 19, 2023, at 11:09 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> just a gentle reminder that the vote is still opened...
>
> I will have little time before Sunday to push the release if voted in, so
> please take your time, but it would be nice to get this long
Hi !
just a gentle reminder that the vote is still opened...
I will have little time before Sunday to push the release if voted in,
so please take your time, but it would be nice to get this long expected
release out next week.
Thanks !
On 14/10/2023 16:57, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi
of the vote so I’ve renamed it.
There’s a bit more. Now, we must use junit5. Doesn’t seem like too big of a
deal as it’s backward compatible and in the test scope.
There are two tests that utilize the apacheDS test runner. They both are
failing after the upgrade. Since I have not been running
I’m a +1 as well.
—
Shawn
> On Oct 16, 2023, at 11:24 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> +1 from me.
>
> However, can you update the JIRA version
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/DIRSERVER/versions/12343914
> and move all "TODO" issues to the next release?
>
> Colm.
Hi Emmanuel,
I don’t want this discussion to get in the way of the vote so I’ve renamed it.
There’s a bit more. Now, we must use junit5. Doesn’t seem like too big of a
deal as it’s backward compatible and in the test scope.
There are two tests that utilize the apacheDS test runner. They both
Hi Colm,
I usually do that when the release is officially voted.
On 17/10/2023 06:24, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
+1 from me.
However, can you update the JIRA version
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/DIRSERVER/versions/12343914
and move all "TODO" issues to the next release?
Colm.
On
+1 from me.
However, can you update the JIRA version
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/DIRSERVER/versions/12343914
and move all "TODO" issues to the next release?
Colm.
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 3:58 PM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> here is - at last! - the Apache DS 2.0.0.AM27
Hi Shawn,
regarding the FrameworkRunner class, it has been removed from ApacheDS
code base when we migrated from Junit4 to Junit 5.
I do think that you need to replace calls to FrameworkRunner by:
@ExtendWith( ApacheDSTestExtension.class )
it should do the trick.
For instance, the AddIT
> On Oct 16, 2023, at 9:12 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi Colm,
>
> just pushed the packages to dist!
Hi Emmanuel.
I’m still testing. I can build and run tests on Java 17. Can install the server
using the snapshots. Have run fortress core integration tests and they all pass.
To use
Hi Colm,
just pushed the packages to dist!
On 16/10/2023 14:58, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Are those the official releases under vote? If so shouldn't they be in
the dist folder?
Colm.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 1:47 PM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi Colm,
you can get them on
https://ci
Are those the official releases under vote? If so shouldn't they be in
the dist folder?
Colm.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 1:47 PM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi Colm,
>
> you can get them on
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Directory/job/dir-server-pipeline/
>
> On 16/
Hi Colm,
you can get them on
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Directory/job/dir-server-pipeline/
On 16/10/2023 12:32, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
Where are the installer packages corresponding to
https://directory.apache.org/apacheds/downloads.html ?
Colm.
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023
Hi Emmanuel,
Where are the installer packages corresponding to
https://directory.apache.org/apacheds/downloads.html ?
Colm.
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 3:58 PM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> here is - at last! - the Apache DS 2.0.0.AM27 release !
>
> It fixes 29 issues, many of them being
Hi,
here is - at last! - the Apache DS 2.0.0.AM27 release !
It fixes 29 issues, many of them being major or critical bugs.
It will certainly not be the last release, some major work is ongoing on
the Password Policy interceptor, and we still have to get Mavibot fully
integrated...
We can't
Hi!
I therefore close this vote with 3 bidning +1:
Colm, Shawn and me.
I will push the packages, update the site and start the ApacheDS viote asap!
On 09/10/2023 09:15, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.5
This release is just bumping up
> On Oct 10, 2023, at 6:55 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote:
>
> +1 checked out by commit, built and ran test on JDK 11. Ran the fortress
> tests.
Err JDK 17
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@directory.apache.org
For
> On Oct 9, 2023, at 4:15 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.5
>
> This release is just bumping up some dependencies like MINA 2.2.3, and a few
> others. It's needed for the coming release of
updating it to flag
the correct versions?
Colm.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 8:15 AM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.5
This release is just bumping up some dependencies like MINA 2.2.3, and a
few others. It's needed for the coming release of Apache
are
recommended to upgrade to 2.10
If it's a false positive for 2.3.0 and you wrote the description
@Emmanuel Lécharny , can you contact NIST about updating it to flag
the correct versions?
Colm.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 8:15 AM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.5
This release is just bumping up some dependencies like MINA 2.2.3, and a
few others. It's needed for the coming release of Apache Directory Server.
The revision :
https://github.com/apache/directory-ldap-api/commit
Closing with 3 +1 binding votes. Emmanuel, Colm and I.
Thanks!
—
Shawn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@directory.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@directory.apache.org
For just the dependabot alerts, you can ask INFRA like in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22828
If you want dependabot pull requests, then let me know and I can help
with that part.
Colm.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:18 AM Shawn McKinney
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 6, 2023, at 1:09 AM,
> On Sep 6, 2023, at 1:09 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> +1.
>
> Just one thing I noticed Shawn, is that /lib/ehcache-2.10.9.2.jar
> contains a large amount of embedded CVEs (Jackson, Jetty), is it
> planned to update to ehcache 3.x?
Interesting that I missed this. I’ll have another
e ok.
>
> Built from tag and from zip file, signature verified, tests passed green.
>
> Thanks Shawn !
>
> On 01/09/2023 22:53, Shawn McKinney wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is an announcement to vote for the next release of Apache Directory
> > Fortress,
My +1.
The problem I had was due to the presence of the slapd.properties file.
Once removed, all the tests were ok.
Built from tag and from zip file, signature verified, tests passed green.
Thanks Shawn !
On 01/09/2023 22:53, Shawn McKinney wrote:
Hello,
This is an announcement to vote
> On Sep 4, 2023, at 9:31 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hey Shawn,
>
> yes, it's ApacheDS, and yes, it seems it uses the wrong port. I tried to
> modify the config to sert 20389, to no avail.
>
> It used to work, so I guess there were some modifications recently...
>
> On 04/09/2023
Hey Shawn,
yes, it's ApacheDS, and yes, it seems it uses the wrong port. I tried to
modify the config to sert 20389, to no avail.
It used to work, so I guess there were some modifications recently...
On 04/09/2023 13:36, Shawn McKinney wrote:
On Sep 3, 2023, at 8:32 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> On Sep 3, 2023, at 8:32 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
> just checked out the tag (3.0.0) and tried it, got an error in SECTION 4,
> step 2:
>
Hey Emmanuel,
Based on the error (extracted from output below):
```
2023-09-04 03:30:009 INFO LdapConnectionProvider:425 - Use
ible solutions,
please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException
Any idea?
On 01/09/2023 22:53, Shawn McKinney wrote:
Hello,
This is an announcement to vote for the next release of Apache Directory
Fortress, 3.0.0.
Hello,
This is an announcement to vote for the next release of Apache Directory
Fortress, 3.0.0.
Here are the list of bugs and enhancements:
- [fortress jira issues
3.0](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FC/versions/12346614)
A tag created for git: ‘3.0.0', and the sources may
Hi!
I'm closing this vvote with 3 bidning +1:
Colm,
Shawn
and myself.
I'll push the packages and update the site.
Thanks !
On 19/08/2023 00:52, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.4
It's a bug fix release with a migration to MINA 2.2.2
023, at 5:52 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.4
> >
> > It's a bug fix release with a migration to MINA 2.2.2, and a fix in
> > the way we manage DN ancestors
> > The revision
Hi !
I really need a third vvote for this release.
Thanks!
On 19/08/2023 00:52, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.4
It's a bug fix release with a migration to MINA 2.2.2, and a fix in
the way we manage DN ancestors
The revision :
https
> On Aug 18, 2023, at 5:52 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.4
>
> It's a bug fix release with a migration to MINA 2.2.2, and a fix in
> the way we manage DN ancestors
> The revision :
>
> ht
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.4
It's a bug fix release with a migration to MINA 2.2.2, and a fix in
the way we manage DN ancestors
The revision :
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=directory-ldap-api.git;a=commit;h=bb24c0c6516f997156154bc309c773d87fe30ad7
Hi,
I close this vote with 3 +1:
Colm, Shawn and me.
I'll release the pckages.
Thanks !
On 06/04/2023 07:06, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.3
It's a bug fix release with some Schema extension to support the
latest PasswordPolicy
> On Apr 6, 2023, at 12:06 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.3
>
+ 1
Built from source, ran the api and fortress tests w/ Java 11.
I observed building required >= maven 3.8.
Nice work Emmanuel.
—
Sha
+1.
Colm.
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 6:07 AM Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.3
>
> It's a bug fix release with some Schema extension to support the
> latest PasswordPolicy draft.
>
> Here are the fixed issues
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.3
It's a bug fix release with some Schema extension to support the
latest PasswordPolicy draft.
Here are the fixed issues:
DIRAPI-385: Add a way to modify the Element in a DnNode
DIRAPI-386: The parsing of a wrong filter throws
With 3 +1 votes, and no other votes, this vote passes.
Colm.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 2:58 PM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> My +1
>
> Built from git and packages.
>
> On 09/02/2023 12:25, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> > This is a vote to release Apache Kerby 2.0.
My +1
Built from git and packages.
On 09/02/2023 12:25, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Kerby 2.0.3:
Release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310910=12351717
Git tag: https://github.com/apache/directory-kerby/releases/tag
> On Feb 9, 2023, at 5:25 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release Apache Kerby 2.0.3:
>
> Release notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310910=12351717
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/directory-kerb
This is a vote to release Apache Kerby 2.0.3:
Release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310910=12351717
Git tag: https://github.com/apache/directory-kerby/releases/tag/kerby-all-2.0.3
Artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories
Hi!
I'm closing this vote with 3 bidning +1:
Shawn, Stefan and me.
I'll push the packages, update the site and announce the release.
Thanks !
On 14/08/2022 08:12, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
+1
* Built from source
* Verified checksums and signatures
* Tested in Studio
On 8/10/22 08:44, Emmanuel
+1
* Built from source
* Verified checksums and signatures
* Tested in Studio
On 8/10/22 08:44, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.2
This is a correction in the package construction, in order to be bale to
run Apache Directory Server
> On Aug 10, 2022, at 1:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.2
>
> This is a correction in the package construction, in order to be bale to run
> Apache Directory Server with Java 8 (with th
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.2
This is a correction in the package construction, in order to be bale to
run Apache Directory Server with Java 8 (with the 2.1.1 version, Java 11
was required). There is no other significative change.
The revision :
https
Hi,
I'm closing this vote with 3 binding +1:
- Shawn
- Stefan
and me.
The package was properly built with Java 8 target, I checked the
produced jars.
Thanks for the votes, I will push the packages and make teh announcement
asap!
Next step: Apache DS release ;-)
On 03/08/2022 09:11
Hi,
I may withdraw this vote, as I think we have an issue with the way I
compiled the packages.
For some reason, I *may* have used Java 11 to build the release, and it
may have generated a package that is not compatible with Java 8 (not
sure yet).
There is a missing profile in the pom
ApacheDS release I assume)
Thanks Emmanuel!
On 7/29/22 06:54, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.1
This is a bug fix release. It also contains a switch to MINA 2.2.1,
which includes a complete rewrite of the TLS layer
The revision :
https
> On Jul 28, 2022, at 11:54 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.1
>
> This is a bug fix release. It also contains a switch to MINA 2.2.1, which
> includes a complete rewrite of the TLS layer
>
> T
Hi all,
this is a vote for the release of Apache LDAP API 2.1.1
This is a bug fix release. It also contains a switch to MINA 2.2.1,
which includes a complete rewrite of the TLS layer
The revision :
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=directory-ldap-api.git;a=commit;h
Closing with 3 +1 binding votes. Emmanuel, Colm and I.
Will move the packages into distribution folders and update the website over
the next couple of days.
Thanks
—
Shawn
> On Jul 21, 2022, at 5:06 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
> I guess you could override the versions
> On Jul 21, 2022, at 5:06 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> I guess you could override the versions of the following jars to 5.3.22:
>
> [INFO] | +- org.springframework:spring-aop:jar:5.3.21:compile
>> [INFO] | +- org.springframework:spring-beans:jar:5.3.21:compile
>> [INFO] | +-
Hi Shawn,
I guess you could override the versions of the following jars to 5.3.22:
[INFO] | +- org.springframework:spring-aop:jar:5.3.21:compile
> [INFO] | +- org.springframework:spring-beans:jar:5.3.21:compile
> [INFO] | +- org.springframework:spring-context:jar:5.3.21:compile
> [INFO] | +-
> On Jul 20, 2022, at 8:43 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote:
>
> I’d need to be convinced that going with a previous version of spring
> security to match the core is advisable due to all of the CVE’s. In any
> case, there isn’t a a 5.3.22 spring core version.
Err, the other way around. … There
> On Jul 20, 2022, at 2:53 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> I noticed in the rest project that there are two Spring versions:
>
> [INFO] +- org.springframework:spring-core:jar:5.3.22:compile
> [INFO] | \- org.springframework:spring-jcl:jar:5.3.22:compile
> [INFO] +-
Hi,
I noticed in the rest project that there are two Spring versions:
[INFO] +- org.springframework:spring-core:jar:5.3.22:compile
[INFO] | \- org.springframework:spring-jcl:jar:5.3.22:compile
[INFO] +- org.springframework.security:spring-security-web:jar:5.7.2:compile
[INFO] | +-
> On Jul 19, 2022, at 8:30 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> BTW, just noticed that fortress-commanderrequires Java 11, while the other
> components only require java 8. Is this intended?
Emmanuel,
Yes. The upgrade to latest Wicket v9 requires the jump to java 11.
The others still happily
packages, checked fortress against ApacheDS, all was
smooth and green !
Many thanks, Shawn, great job !
On 17/07/2022 21:47, Shawn McKinney wrote:
Hello,
This is an announcement to vote for the next release of Apache
Directory Fortress, 2.0.8.
Here are the list of bugs and enhancements
,
This is an announcement to vote for the next release of Apache Directory
Fortress, 2.0.8.
Here are the list of bugs and enhancements:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FC/versions/12351048
A tag created for git: ‘2.0.8', and the sources may be pulled using git
commands:
git clone --branch 2.0.8
https
Hello,
This is an announcement to vote for the next release of Apache Directory
Fortress, 2.0.8.
Here are the list of bugs and enhancements:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FC/versions/12351048
A tag created for git: ‘2.0.8', and the sources may be pulled using git
commands:
git
Sorry for the late +1 !
On 04/05/2022 09:23, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Kerby 2.0.2.
Issues fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310910=12348361
Git tag: https://github.com/apache/directory-kerby/tree/kerby-all-2.0.2
With 3 binding +1 votes, and no other votes, this vote passes - I'll
do the release.
Colm.
On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 2:03 PM 李佳佳(佳加)
wrote:
>
> +1, built successfully and all the tests passed.
>
> Thanks,
> Jiajia
>
>
> --
+1, built successfully and all the tests passed.
Thanks,
Jiajia
--
From:Colm O hEigeartaigh
Sent At:2022 May 4 (Wed.) 15:23
To:Apache Directory Developers List ; kerby
Subject:[VOTE] - Release Apache Kerby 2.0.2
This is a vote
+1 checked out tag, built / ran the tests.
—
Shawn
> On May 4, 2022, at 2:23 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release Apache Kerby 2.0.2.
>
> Issues fixed:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310910=12348361
> Git ta
This is a vote to release Apache Kerby 2.0.2.
Issues fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310910=12348361
Git tag: https://github.com/apache/directory-kerby/tree/kerby-all-2.0.2
Artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory
Rectification:
https://github.com/apache/sling-parent/blob/3fdb306971308cf471ee85c72fb86b0bc4087d69/sling-parent/pom.xml#L373
This is how Sling did.
On 22/07/2021 02:15, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
On 21/07/2021 18:47, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On 7/18/21 11:43 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
My
On 21/07/2021 18:47, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On 7/18/21 11:43 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
My +1.
A few remarks:
- your GPG keys does not seem to be trusted (this is when I use the asc
file to check the signature). I typically get:
$ gpg --verify
Closing with 3 binding votes from Shawn, Emmanuel and me.
On 7/18/21 8:58 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the next Studio release.
>
> This is mainly a bugfix and security enhancement release. The full
> release notes are here:
> https://issues.a
On 7/18/21 11:43 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> My +1.
>
> A few remarks:
> - your GPG keys does not seem to be trusted (this is when I use the asc
> file to check the signature). I typically get:
>
> $ gpg --verify
>
HA 256/512
None blocker, though.
Many thanks Stefan !
On 18/07/2021 08:58, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi all,
this is a vote for the next Studio release.
This is mainly a bugfix and security enhancement release. The full
release notes are here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Releas
t; Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the next Studio release.
>
> This is mainly a bugfix and security enhancement release. The full
> release notes are here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310590=12349721
>
> Git tag:
> https://gitbox.apache.
Hi all,
this is a vote for the next Studio release.
This is mainly a bugfix and security enhancement release. The full
release notes are here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310590=12349721
Git tag:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=directory-studio.git
YI, I won't have time before Sunday to check the release.
>>>
>>> On 7/6/21 8:57 PM, Shawn McKinney wrote:
>>>> I have removed (and verified) the jboss jar dependency from fortress
>>>> rest. The repos are retagged. Artifacts rebuilt and staged on
1 - 100 of 2428 matches
Mail list logo
