Re: Implementing Interceptor Extendibility, another way of doing things...

2011-11-03 Thread Alex Karasulu
Hi all, Forgive the prepost here: need to report on a off list conversation I just had with Emmanuel. We generated some very nice ideas on these matters. I'm going to be very direct with implementation details rather than being high level and general with these ideas to directly dump the

Re: Implementing Interceptor Extendibility, another way of doing things...

2011-11-03 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 11/3/11 12:54 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: Hi all, Forgive the prepost here: need to report on a off list conversation I just had with Emmanuel. We generated some very nice ideas on these matters. I'm going to be very direct with implementation details rather than being high level and general

Re: Implementing Interceptor Extendibility, another way of doing things...

2011-11-03 Thread Kiran Ayyagari
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I had a bit of time and I reviewed the interceptors today. And I had an idea which may be interesting to discuss. First, here is a table where all the interceptors operation are listed, and for each

Re: Implementing Interceptor Extendibility, another way of doing things...

2011-11-03 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote: On 11/3/11 12:54 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: Hi all, Forgive the prepost here: need to report on a off list conversation I just had with Emmanuel. We generated some very nice ideas on these matters. I'm going to be

Re: Implementing Interceptor Extendibility, another way of doing things...

2011-11-03 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
On 11/3/11 3:21 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.comwrote: On 11/3/11 12:54 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: - we have to store a aspect- interceptor map in the config too (DIT) -1 Our proposed solution removes the need for this. The

Re: Implementing Interceptor Extendibility, another way of doing things...

2011-11-03 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.orgwrote: On 11/3/11 3:21 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com** wrote: On 11/3/11 12:54 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: - we have to store a aspect- interceptor map in

Re: Implementing Interceptor Extendibility, another way of doing things...

2011-11-03 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
On 11/3/11 3:39 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: - we must get rid of bypasses. They are far too numerous, and probably out of control. 0 I don't know the answer to this myself. We need more discussion for us to see if this is the case. I think each logical aspect managed in the configuration

Implementing Interceptor Extendibility, another way of doing things...

2011-11-02 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Hi guys, I had a bit of time and I reviewed the interceptors today. And I had an idea which may be interesting to discuss. First, here is a table where all the interceptors operation are listed, and for each interceptor, I listed the operation they are processing :