Hi guys,
first, I'm please to inform you all that the Kerberos protocol codec has
been completed today. It was a painful job, with more than 30 000 slocs
generated. Now, it's time to include this work into the kerberos server.
Atm I'm reviewing what we have done, and try to clean up the thing
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> first, I'm please to inform you all that the Kerberos protocol codec has
> been completed today. It was a painful job, with more than 30 000 slocs
> generated. Now, it's time to include this work into the kerberos server.
>
m
On 11/27/10 2:32 PM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
Atm I'm reviewing what we have done, and try to clean up the thing, as the
code we wrote at the end is different from what we started with, as we
improved the process a lot. There are a few points I think worth discussing.
- The loggers. Currently, we
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> first, I'm please to inform you all that the Kerberos protocol codec has
> been completed today. It was a painful job, with more than 30 000 slocs
> generated. Now, it's time to include this work into the kerberos server.
>
>
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> On 11/27/10 2:32 PM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
>
>> Atm I'm reviewing what we have done, and try to clean up the thing, as the
>>
>>> code we wrote at the end is different from what we started with, as we
>>> improved the process a lot. There
On 11/27/10 6:49 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnywrote:
On 11/27/10 2:32 PM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
Atm I'm reviewing what we have done, and try to clean up the thing, as the
code we wrote at the end is different from what we started with, as we
imp
