RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

in authorization domain!! Regards, Kai -Original Message- From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:kai.zh...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 8:41 PM To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org> Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization Great discu

RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

<dev@directory.apache.org> Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization Le 26/05/16 à 04:17, Richard Feezel a écrit : > Kai, > > I recall that the Kerberos specifications indicate that empty lists > (sequences) should not be included in the ASN.1 encoded by

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

Le 26/05/16 à 04:17, Richard Feezel a écrit : > Kai, > > I recall that the Kerberos specifications indicate that empty lists > (sequences) should not be included in the ASN.1 encoded byte stream. Thus > the correct representation of items that are empty in object space is with > NULL, not with a

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

> > How do you think? Thanks again. > > > > Regards, > > Kai > > > > *From:* Richard Feezel [mailto:rfee...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:26 AM > *To:* Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org> > *Subject:* Re:

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

There was a general problem with the ASN.1 decoding code prior to our patch. Objects were being created even though the corresponding (optional) tag never appeared in the ASN.1 byte stream being decoded. In the case of a SEQUENCE-OF an empty container was being created. This did not correctly

RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

ia...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 9:47 AM To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org> Cc: ke...@directory.apache.org Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization Hi Gerard, I think this commit "https://github.

RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

-- From: Gerard Gagliano [mailto:gera...@prodentity.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 9:14 AM To: Apache Directory Developers List Cc: ke...@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization Kai, That sounds good. Could you be specifiec what version to get.

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

esday, April 05, 2016 7:05 AM > To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>; > ke...@directory.apache.org > Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization > > Thanks for the sync up Gerard! > > We don't have concrete plan for RC3 yet. I'm

RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 7:05 AM To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>; ke...@directory.apache.org Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization Thanks for the sync up Gerard! We don't have concrete plan for RC3 yet. I'm thinking that a

RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

ct: Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization Kai, We are thinking about some additional stuff, but this is all we have done thus far. As for tests, Richard is putting some together. What time frame are you thinking for RC3? Also, are you aware of any Java code that can parse

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

Kai, We are thinking about some additional stuff, but this is all we have done thus far. As for tests, Richard is putting some together. What time frame are you thinking for RC3? Also, are you aware of any Java code that can parse MS-PAC? Thanks! g -- > On Apr 4, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Kai

RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

Thanks Richard and Gerard for the quick changes, I will test the new patch soon. Regards, Jiajia From: Richard Feezel [mailto:rfee...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 7:50 PM To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization I have

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

ards, > > Kai > > > > *From:* Richard Feezel [mailto:rfee...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, March 31, 2016 11:51 AM > *To:* Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org> > *Subject:* Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization > > &g

RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

ct: Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization PersonnelRecordTest is indeed failing due to changes in Asn1CollectionType.java in the patch. Unfortunately we can't simply roll back the changes because the changes were made to address a problem with the decoding logic which resulted in

RE: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

AM To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization I don't believe ADAuthenticationIndicators, note the S at the end belongs. It was renamed to singular. On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Gerard Gagliano <gera...@prodentity.com<mailt

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

PersonnelRecordTest is indeed failing due to changes in Asn1CollectionType.java in the patch. Unfortunately we can't simply roll back the changes because the changes were made to address a problem with the decoding logic which resulted in adding default or empty values to the decoded object when

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

I don't believe ADAuthenticationIndicators, note the S at the end belongs. It was renamed to singular. On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Gerard Gagliano wrote: > There should not be any compilation issues, can you describe the errors? > > -- > > On Mar 30, 2016, at 7:44

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-542) Kerby Authorization

There should not be any compilation issues, can you describe the errors? -- > On Mar 30, 2016, at 7:44 PM, Jiajia Li (JIRA) wrote: > > >[ >