please revert this commit.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06 PM, elecha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: elecharny
Date: Wed Mar 14 19:06:17 2012
New Revision: 1300690
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1300690view=rev
Log:
o Added a type for LogEdit stored into UserLogRecord, in order to be
Selcuk,
I have seen you asking several times on this list for reverting commits,
this seems to be a bit derogatory in OSS spirit and team work.
Go ahead and make your changes on top of these if you wish to apply
your fix, commits need not be reverted for this.
On Thu, Mar 15,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Kiran Ayyagari kayyag...@apache.orgwrote:
Selcuk,
I have seen you asking several times on this list for reverting commits,
this seems to be a bit derogatory in OSS spirit and team work.
It can certainly be misinterpreted this way. I think we just need
HI All,
Sorry for the earlier email. I think I owe some explaination on my
part. The reason for my request is purely technical, does not aim at
oss spirit or any other spirit for that matter:
* There are quite a number of files the txn branch is touching.
* There is no file ownership or review
Le 3/14/12 10:48 PM, Alex Karasulu a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Kiran Ayyagarikayyag...@apache.orgwrote:
Selcuk,
I have seen you asking several times on this list for reverting commits,
this seems to be a bit derogatory in OSS spirit and team work.
It can certainly be
Le 3/14/12 10:52 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
HI All,
Sorry for the earlier email. I think I owe some explaination on my
part. The reason for my request is purely technical, does not aim at
oss spirit or any other spirit for that matter:
* There are quite a number of files the txn branch is
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 3/14/12 10:52 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
HI All,
Sorry for the earlier email. I think I owe some explaination on my
part. The reason for my request is purely technical, does not aim at
oss spirit or any other
Le 3/14/12 11:32 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 3/14/12 10:52 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
HI All,
Sorry for the earlier email. I think I owe some explaination on my
part. The reason for my request is purely technical,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 3/14/12 11:32 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 3/14/12 10:52 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
HI All,
Sorry for the earlier email. I think I
Le 3/14/12 11:56 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 3/14/12 11:32 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 3/14/12 10:52 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
HI All,
Some more clarifications about the changes :
when we write a LogEdit, we have two cases :
1) we write a ChangeDataContainer
2) we write a Transaction state
In the first case, we serialize the data in the log( LogEdit, sync)
method using the current transaction logRecord, then we call the log(
11 matches
Mail list logo