Sorry, I didn't get the chance to take a look your pull request. There is
also a pull request (updating the libthrift version in core) which will
touch quite bunch of files. I am trying to figure out a plan for
accommodate these two changes. I will try to comment on your pull request.
- Sijie
On
Any updates on this? Can we get this change in ASAP? so I can rebase my
branches to the new package namespace. Appreciate any updates.
- KN
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Khurrum,
>
> thank your so much for making this change. I will try to take a look and
> get back to you
Khurrum,
thank your so much for making this change. I will try to take a look and
get back to you soon.
- Sijie
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim
wrote:
> Forgot the pull request -
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/41
>
> - KN
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:
Forgot the pull request -
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/41
- KN
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim
wrote:
> I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
> com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
>
> (basically just renamed files a
I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
(basically just renamed files and sed/replace the package name)
Let me know if it is okay.
- KN
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Khurrum, I don't think anyone is w
Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to pick it
up.
- Sijie
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim
wrote:
> Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
>
> - KN
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On
Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
- KN
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
>
>> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira
>> wrote:
>>
+1
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>
> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
> >
> > On Repackaging
> >
> > It is recommended - but not mandated
+ 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
>
> On Repackaging
>
> It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under the
> Apache namespace. There is no need
It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
On Repackaging
It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under the
Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For example,
Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a
Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
- Sijie
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to under
> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
>
> - Sijie
>
Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to under
org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
- Sijie
12 matches
Mail list logo
