Re: [documentation-dev] Why are we supporting Avery wrt labels?

2007-01-21 Thread Mike Williams
On Monday 22 January 2007 06:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think a small but important point needs to be made: > I think we need to offer easy-to-access industry standards. MSO is an > industry standard. So is Avery. Not true. Industry standards adhere to IEEE standards (http://standards.i

Re: [documentation-dev] Why are we supporting Avery wrt labels?

2007-01-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anybody contacted Avery, and what was their response? I think we need to offer easy-to-access industry standards. MSO is an industry standard. So is Avery. However, the way we offer them can be different, depending on the amount of support we get. The Avery Wizard in MSO is available by cl

Re: [documentation-dev] Why are we supporting Avery wrt labels?

2007-01-21 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 00:48 +0200, Ain Vagula wrote: > On 1/21/07, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > > > No. What I am saying is that we have sponsors who support OOo directly. > > > I feel that their products should take precedence over other > > > manufac