Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Gary Schnabl wrote:
If anybody wants a DocBook 4.5 or DocBook 5.x templates, I could do a
Structured FrameMaker implementation of them as I already produced
the FrameMaker EDD files from the DocBook 4.5 and 5.0 DTDs, although
Norman Walsh never completed the DTD for
Gary Schnabl wrote:
If anybody wants a DocBook 4.5 or DocBook 5.x templates, I could do a
Structured FrameMaker implementation of them as I already produced the
FrameMaker EDD files from the DocBook 4.5 and 5.0 DTDs, although Norman
Walsh never completed the DTD for the current DocBook 5.0 tw
Nino Novak wrote:
Clayton wrote:
One of the big reasons we moved/pushed towards using the Wiki for
docs is.. to try and get more community involvement...
The example I have is the DevGuide. ... With this doc in the
Wiki, it is subject to a steady stream of edits by developers and
community m
BTW, it's consistent... (w/o an 'a').
What flavor of DocBook is OOo planning to use: 4.1.2 (what Writer "has,"
so to speak), 4.5 the final version with a normative DTD, or the
two-year old 5.0 (w/o a normative DTD, or a complete DTD, BTW)?
After that choice is made, any DocBook document still
> ok, I've understood that it has not been a technical reason to give the
> wiki a try but community involvement. It's good to keep this in mind.
That is the one thing I really find important as well. The more
community involvement we have, the better. :-)
> But with the User Guides - did you
On Friday 04 September 2009 15:55, Clayton wrote:
>
> One of the big reasons we moved/pushed towards using the Wiki for
> docs is.. to try and get more community involvement... basically
> lowering the entry barrier to editing the docs. In at least some
> documents, this has worked quite well. The
>> In a perfect world, I'd like to be able to use OOoWriter to author and
>> edit the docs, save them to webserver (just via save), and be able to
>> automatically/immediately have them rendered into Webpages (as in the
>> way the Wiki works). There is not yet a OOo based Wiki :-) It'd be the
>> b
Hi,
On 09/04/09 15:55, Clayton wrote:
...
If we argue that we can use Writer as a DocBook editor (it is
technically possible to export DocBook from Writer), then why bother
with DocBook? Do the docs right in ODT.
No matter which way we go (Wiki, DocBook, or something else), we will
have issues
OOo has very primitive DocBook support. In fact, it uses DocBook 4.1.2
from eons ago. DocBook currently has been at DocBook 5 since the summer
of 2007, I believe.
I have produced DocBook 4.5 and DocBook 5 EDDs for Adobe FrameMaker,
although the DB 5 version is a very small bit incomplete becau
> If we choose to use some other application that must be installed
> separately or some special OOo configuration requiring plugins and user
> IDs on certain webservers etc., we will immediately eliminate a segment
> of contributors, and the doc workload falls back 100% to a very very
> small team
> I'm not an expert - to be honest I hoped to meet the experts here ;-)
> but on the German community mailing list we had a discussion if it
> makes sense to use the wiki for documentation at all - as this raises
> the problem of double bookkeeping and of converting documents. A
> possible solu
On Friday 04 September 2009 13:46, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> Nino Novak wrote:
> > A propos inconsistencies: Has there been a thought/discussion to
> > use DocBook as master for documentation?
>
> I know that OOo is supposed to deal with DocBook files in some way,
> but I've never understood how t
Nino Novak wrote:
A propos inconsistencies: Has there been a thought/discussion to use
DocBook as master for documentation?
I know that OOo is supposed to deal with DocBook files in some way, but I've
never understood how that works. Would love to learn more.
Can Writer create/edit DocBook
13 matches
Mail list logo
