On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:42:59 +0100
Nino Novak wrote:
> > I've just started the WikiBot on this task. It should be cleaned up
> > fairly soon.
>
> does the bot check "what links here" and the page history also?
>
> I mean, the present procedure with the Template:Delete does not make
> sense,
On Monday 30 November 2009 11:50, ccornell - OpenOffice.org wrote:
> > BTW, can somebody with the permission to do so please clear out
> > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Category:Candidates_for_sp
> >eedy_deletion Esp. the categories should go because the longer they
> > stay, the higher
ccornell - OpenOffice.org wrote:
Http-Links in the same Wiki are evil and stupid.
I just replaced them all :-)
(at least those I could find with Search)
mmh, this can be probably done with a wiki bot automatically. A bot
running all 3 months or so and search for URLs starting with
htpp://wi
Http-Links in the same Wiki are evil and stupid.
I just replaced them all :-)
(at least those I could find with Search)
mmh, this can be probably done with a wiki bot automatically. A bot
running all 3 months or so and search for URLs starting with
htpp://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki. A
On Monday 30 November 2009 13:11, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
> Nino Novak wrote:
> > On Monday 30 November 2009 11:20, bjoern michaelsen - Sun
> > Microsystems -
> >
> > Hamburg Germany wrote:
> >> Http-Links in the same Wiki are evil and stupid.
> >
> > I just replaced them all :-)
> > (at least those
Nino Novak wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 11:20, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems -
Hamburg Germany wrote:
Http-Links in the same Wiki are evil and stupid.
I just replaced them all :-)
(at least those I could find with Search)
mmh, this can be probably done with a wiki bot automatic
On Monday 30 November 2009 11:20, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems -
Hamburg Germany wrote:
> Http-Links in the same Wiki are evil and stupid.
I just replaced them all :-)
(at least those I could find with Search)
> Most importantly
> those links do not show up in "What links here"
That's
On 11/30/09 11:50, ccornell - OpenOffice.org wrote:
BTW, can somebody with the permission to do so please clear out
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion
Esp. the categories should go because the longer they stay, the
higher is the risk that they will
BTW, can somebody with the permission to do so please clear out
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion
Esp. the categories should go because the longer they stay, the
higher is the risk that they will be used again (although they are
redundant). Also, when
Please unsubscribe me from all list thank you
I've contacted this user off-list.
C.
--
Clayton Cornell ccorn...@openoffice.org
OpenOffice.org Documentation Project co-lead
StarOffice - Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Hamburg, Germany
-
@documentation.openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [documentation-dev] Using relative path names on Wiki pages
Sent: Nov 30, 2009 5:20 AM
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:00:50 +0100
"ccornell - OpenOffice.org" wrote:
> Ultimately it gets the job done, but internal links really should not
> be linke
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:00:50 +0100
"ccornell - OpenOffice.org" wrote:
> Ultimately it gets the job done, but internal links really should not
> be linked using external link syntax - that is more of an issue than
> using absolute over relative internal links.
>
> There are not a lot of instances
I still find that people are using the full http path for links
within the Wiki... so a link to the next page shows as an external
link instead of an internal link. :-(
Ok, but is that a big problem?
Ultimately it gets the job done, but internal links really should not be
linked using extern
On Monday 30 November 2009 10:48, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> Nino Novak wrote:
> > ccornell - OpenOffice.org wrote:
> >> Are
> >> there any "gotchas" that anyone can think of with using relative
> >> links? What about with transcluded content? The User Guides use a
> >> lot of transluded pages
Nino Novak wrote:
ccornell - OpenOffice.org wrote:
Are
there any "gotchas" that anyone can think of with using relative
links? What about with transcluded content? The User Guides use a
lot of transluded pages
Where? I only once saw a transcluded content (AFAIR a function reference
page
On Monday 30 November 2009 09:26, ccornell - OpenOffice.org wrote:
> > But that's not what I meant. What I meant is like in the file
> > system: absolute paths start at the root. So e.g. (imaginary)
> > [[Documentation/UserGuide/GettingStarted/chapter1]]
> > is an absolute path, while relative pa
But that's not what I meant. What I meant is like in the file system:
absolute paths start at the root. So e.g. (imaginary)
[[Documentation/UserGuide/GettingStarted/chapter1]]
is an absolute path, while relative paths start with the present
document's path, so to link to the above Page from an
Nino Novak wrote:
But that's not what I meant. What I meant is like in the file system:
absolute paths start at the root. So e.g. (imaginary)
[[Documentation/UserGuide/GettingStarted/chapter1]]
is an absolute path, while relative paths start with the present
document's path, so to link to t
On Saturday 28 November 2009 17:51, Nino Novak wrote:
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 17:27, T. J. Frazier wrote:
> > Nino Novak wrote:
> > > I just noticed that in many places, Pages as well as Templates,
> > > absolute path names were used for links to associated pages. This
> > > makes moving and
On Saturday 28 November 2009 17:27, T. J. Frazier wrote:
> Nino Novak wrote:
> > I just noticed that in many places, Pages as well as Templates,
> > absolute path names were used for links to associated pages. This
> > makes moving and translation more difficult than if relative path
> > names were
Nino Novak wrote:
I just noticed that in many places, Pages as well as Templates, absolute
path names were used for links to associated pages. This makes moving
and translation more difficult than if relative path names were used.
It's not a great thing, but maybe the one or the other didn't e
I just noticed that in many places, Pages as well as Templates, absolute
path names were used for links to associated pages. This makes moving
and translation more difficult than if relative path names were used.
It's not a great thing, but maybe the one or the other didn't even know
of the pos
22 matches
Mail list logo
