Hello everyone.
Currently I'm trying to setup DPDK's KNI moudle on my x86 machine and I
succeed to up vEth0 using kni module.
However, I can't get raw socket from vEth0 interface because there is no
sock_en file in /sys/class/net/vEth0
directory of my host linux machine.
What should I do next? Sh
Hi,
So far as you are doing the init properly in a controlled fashion from one
core, you should be able to orchestrate the usecase with your own threads.
I don't think so there should be any limitations.
Regards
-Prashant
From: Jyotiswarup Raiturkar [mailto:jyoti...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wedne
Hi Prashant
Thanks for the reply.
I understand what you said. But my query was can i use pthread_create() to
create the 'tight loop' threads on demand, rather than spawing the threads
at start with rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(). Does anything in the dpdk core
preclude using pthread_create() calls d
Hi Jyoti,
You can configure the number of tx and rx queues via the software when you are
calling the rte_eth_dev_configure.
However you cannot allocate more than what the NIC supports. But you can
allocate less ofcourse.
Typically the queues are used so that independent cores can do tx and rx o
Hi Jyoti,
You must carefully analyse your usecase.
Typically each core must run a tight loop (and therefore one thread spawned by
remote launch) which does a while 1 { get packet, service packet }
You should try to build your application around the above paradigm.
One of your cores can service t
Hello Devs
I'm new to DPDK and trying to understand the basics..
I want to write a DPDK app where I want to configure shm rings on the fly,
and I want one thread(per core) to service the ring.
In some of the examples I saw rte_eal_mp_remote_launch() being used, but
this is a one time launch. Can I
Hello Devs
I'm new to DPDK and trying to understand the basics. I went through the
programming guide but I had one question regarding Tx and Rx queues per
port. Are they configurable entirely in software or do they depend on the
HW (NIC)? Does the L2 configuration (MAC address) apply to all the que
Hi Thomas,
>>Please, keep us informed about the needed PF patch.
First of all, where and how should I post the patch to PF driver?
And secondly I have only 82599, so I cannot run test for 82598 and
X540. Is it possible that you could test on different NIC?
thx &
rgds,
-ql
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 a
- Configuration for combined and shared library was only in the template
defconfig_x86_64-default-linuxapp-gcc.
- CONFIG_RTE_LIBNAME was in the wrong section
- CONFIG_RTE_LIBNAME quotes were not properly removed in "make context"
- RTE_LIBNAME had no quote in "C context" (include/rte_config.h)
Sig
21/10/2013 16:11, Qinglai Xiao :
> Physical Function assignes Tx/Rx queues to each VF according to
> different schemes[1]. By querying through mailbox, VF is able to
> get number of Tx/Rx queues assigned to it.
>
> Note that current Intel ixgbe driver ixgbe-3.18.7 does not fully
> support mailbox
10 matches
Mail list logo
