Palin,
Support for the i217 will be available in the Intel DPDK version 1.7. I?m
not sure of the timeline, but next release.
Gerald
On 1/30/14, 10:59 AM, "Palin, Francois"
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>We would like to know if DPDK support for the i217 will be provided
>anytime soon.
>The Supported NICs
Hi all,
We would like to know if DPDK support for the i217 will be provided anytime
soon.
The Supported NICs list does't show the i217. Intel DPDK Release Notes don't
mention the i217 either.
Thank you !
Fran?ois Palin
Hi Dan,
We are also using Debian 7.3, from the DPDK v1.3.1 up to version 1.5.1r1.
it works completely fine.
regards,
- Hamed
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Daniel Kaminsky <
daniel.kaminsky at infinitelocality.com> wrote:
> We're using CentOS 6.5 and Ubuntu 12.04 and don't see any issue with
hi!
are there any interrupts which are raised by DPDK, for the fifo errors.
please let me know, where can I find the details and how to handle such
interrupts ?
Tx
-SB
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Sharath wrote:
> Thanks Daniel !
> Let me check it out . . .
> On Jan 29, 2014 8:54 PM, "Dan
Hi All,
Any ideas would be helpful
My situation is when I am running the l3fwd under example directory, which
provide by Intel DPDK( Version is 1.2). I modify the source code of l3fwd, its
function is just receive packets from port 0, then call rte_pktmbuf_prepend to
insert a new header t
Prashant,
IVShm is supported by the Intel DPDK client rings, and a patched QEMU/KVM
from the OVDK work on 01.org (https://01.org/packet-processing). The main
part being the patched QEMU/KVM to map the Intel DPDK Huge Page Tables
(with Release of Intel DPDK 1.6 the requirement to map 1 GB huge pag
Hi Pravin,
Request you to please validate atleast one method to interface VM's with your
innovative dpdk port on the OVS.
Preferably IVSHM.
Please do publish the steps for that too.
We really need the above for huge acceptance.
Regards
-Prashant
-Original Message-
From: Pravin Shelar
Hi Dan,
Intel DPDK release notes(1.5.2) mention the following tested OS --
* Fedora release 18
* Ubuntu* 12.04 LTS
* Wind River* Linux* 5
* Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 6.3
* SUSE Enterprise Linux* 11 SP2
I have personally used Fedora 18 and it works fine for me for virtualization
including SRIOV a
Thanks Daniel !
Let me check it out . . .
On Jan 29, 2014 8:54 PM, "Daniel Kaminsky" <
daniel.kaminsky at infinitelocality.com> wrote:
> Hi Sharath,
>
> Try rte_eth_stats_get, I think this should give you what you're looking
> for.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Shara
We're using CentOS 6.5 and Ubuntu 12.04 and don't see any issue with both
of them.
Regards,
Daniel Kaminsky
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya <
prashant.upadhyaya at aricent.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Intel DPDK release notes(1.5.2) mention the following tested OS --
> * Fedor
I never noticed about that and I haven't check compilation with newer kernel.
But I think you have completed to test it.
Fine to me.
thanks,
Hiroshi
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [memnic PATCH] linux: fix build with kernel >= 3.3
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
> ---
> linux/memnic_net.c | 28
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [memnic PATCH] pmd: use memory barrier function instead
> of asm volatile
>
> Use the DPDK specific function rte_mb() instead of
> the GCC statement asm volatile ("" ::: "memory").
Yes, that's preferred for DPDK, I think.
Looks okay to me.
By the way, I was also asked to u
Hi Daniel,
virtio-net-pmd (dpdk-1.5) works on CentOS 6.x . Just verified basic packet
flow with one queue.
Thanks,
Selvaganapathy.C.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Daniel Kan wrote:
> Thanks for the all the feedbacks. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS has 3.8.x kernel and
> Fedcore 18 has 3.10.x kernel. Bo
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [memnic PATCH] pmd: fix attributes
>
> Add missing "const" and remove useless "rte_unused" attributes.
Good catch. Looks fine to me.
thanks,
Hiroshi
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
> ---
> pmd/pmd_memnic.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:07 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/11] kvargs: add test case in app/test
>
> Add a file app/test/test_kvargs.c that checks the rte_kvargs
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:07 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/11] kvargs: make the NULL key to match all
> entries
>
> In rte_kvargs_process() and rte_kvargs_coun
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:07 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/11] kvargs: add the key in handler pameters
>
> This argument can be useful when rte_kvargs_process(
Looks fine to me.
thanks,
Hiroshi
> Subject: [memnic PATCH 3/3] common: remove double underscores
>
> The usage of double underscores is reserved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
> ---
> common/memnic.h |6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/comm
Thanks for the all the feedbacks. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS has 3.8.x kernel and Fedcore
18 has 3.10.x kernel. Both kernels are not compatible with the vmxnet-usermap
driver which supports only up to 3.2.x. virtio-net-pmd requires kernel 3.8.x
and qemu 1.5 for multi-queue support. Since CentOS?s kernel i
> Subject: [memnic PATCH 2/3] pmd: remove useless includes
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
> ---
> common/memnic.h |4
> pmd/pmd_memnic.c |4
> 2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/memnic.h b/common/memnic.h
> index 6ff38a0..58dd019 100644
> --- a/common
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:07 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/11] kvargs: add const attribute in handler
> parameters
>
> The "value" argument is read-only and shou
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:07 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/11] kvargs: be strict when matching a key
>
> When we match a key in is_valid_key() and rte_kvargs_pro
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:07 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/11] kvargs: simpler parsing and allow
> duplicated keys
>
> Remove the rte_kvargs_add_pair() functio
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:07 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/11] kvargs: rework API to fix memory leak
>
> Before the patch, a call to rte_kvargs_tokenize() result
Hi,
> Subject: [memnic PATCH 1/3] pmd: remove symlink
>
> No need to have a symbolic link to a common file
> when it can be simply included.
Looks fine to me.
When I prepared the file with a bit complex file path layout,
easy to keep consistency.
Because you separated the code from DPDK vSwitch
I?m deciding between Debian 7.3 (3.2.0 kernel) and CentOS 6.5 (2.6.32 kernel)
for production. I?m wondering if anyone has recommendation. We run the DPDK
application in a virtualized environment. Currently, we configure NICs in
pass-through mode which gives the best performance. In the future, w
On 01/29/2014 09:47 PM, Fran?ois-Fr?d?ric Ozog wrote:
> In the telecom world, if you fix the underlying framework of an app, you
> will still have to validate the solution, ie app/framework. In addition, the
> idea of shared libraries introduces the implied requirement to validate apps
> against di
27 matches
Mail list logo
