Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: virtual function MTU settings has no meaning

2024-11-17 Thread Raslan Darawsheh
Hi, From: Slava Ovsiienko Sent: Monday, October 28, 2024 4:45 PM To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Raslan Darawsheh; Matan Azrad; Suanming Mou Subject: [PATCH 1/1] doc: virtual function MTU settings has no meaning There is the mlx5 NIC limitations - configuring MTU for PCI Virtual Function has no meaning

RE: [PATCH 1/1] doc: virtual function MTU settings has no meaning

2024-10-28 Thread Slava Ovsiienko
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2024 5:52 PM > To: Slava Ovsiienko > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh ; Matan Azrad > ; Suanming Mou > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: virtual function MTU settings has no meaning > >

[PATCH 1/1] doc: virtual function MTU settings has no meaning

2024-10-28 Thread Viacheslav Ovsiienko
There is the mlx5 NIC limitations - configuring MTU for PCI Virtual Function has no meaning. The actual maximal packet size in VF's receiving is limited by MTU configured on the related PCI Physical Function, the DPDK datapath running over VF should be prepared to handle packets of this maximal siz