This commit extends proc-info application to
display xstats for the eventdev devices.
New command line arguments are introduced to
display xstats for eventdev devices. The command
example is like:
For displaying a specific port stats (e.g. port 1):
./dpdk-proc-info -- --show-edev-port-xstats=1:0
On Thu, 25 May 2023 13:47:31 -0500
Abdullah Sevincer wrote:
> This commit extends proc-info application to
> display xstats for the eventdev devices.
>
> New command line arguments are introduced to
> display xstats for eventdev devices. The command
> example is like:
>
> For displaying a speci
> -Original Message-
> From: Sevincer, Abdullah
> Signed-off-by: Abdullah Sevincer
Acked-by: Reshma Pattan
>+Acked-by: Reshma Pattan
>+Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger
Reminder!
What's the plan to merge this patch?
25/05/2023 22:07, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Thu, 25 May 2023 13:47:31 -0500
> Abdullah Sevincer wrote:
>
> > This commit extends proc-info application to
> > display xstats for the eventdev devices.
> >
> > New command line arguments are introduced to
> > display xstats for eventdev devices. The c
On Fri, 07 Jul 2023 11:15:22 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 25/05/2023 22:07, Stephen Hemminger:
> > On Thu, 25 May 2023 13:47:31 -0500
> > Abdullah Sevincer wrote:
> >
> > > This commit extends proc-info application to
> > > display xstats for the eventdev devices.
> > >
> > > New command l
>+Has new coverity issue.
>+The reason is the boolean is set every time because it gets every time.
>+Looks like code goes over eventdev_var[] even if no eventdevs are present.
>+Should only look for the number of eventdevs
Thanks Stephen, I will add a condition at the top of the function like:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 15:11:45 +
"Sevincer, Abdullah" wrote:
> >+Has new coverity issue.
> >+The reason is the boolean is set every time because it gets every time.
>
> >+Looks like code goes over eventdev_var[] even if no eventdevs are present.
> >+Should only look for the number of eventdev
8 matches
Mail list logo
