For future standardization on the "uint" name for unsigned values rather
than the existing "u64" one, we can for now:
* rename all internal values to use uint rather than u64
* add new function names to alias the existing u64 ones
Suggested-by: Morten Brørup
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
---
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:27:25PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> For future standardization on the "uint" name for unsigned values rather
> than the existing "u64" one, we can for now:
> * rename all internal values to use uint rather than u64
> * add new function names to alias the existing u64
在 2022/12/14 2:27, Bruce Richardson 写道:
For future standardization on the "uint" name for unsigned values rather
than the existing "u64" one, we can for now:
* rename all internal values to use uint rather than u64
* add new function names to alias the existing u64 ones
Suggested-by: Morten Br
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:49:06AM +0800, lihuisong (C) wrote:
>
> 在 2022/12/14 2:27, Bruce Richardson 写道:
> > For future standardization on the "uint" name for unsigned values rather
> > than the existing "u64" one, we can for now:
> > * rename all internal values to use uint rather than u64
> >
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:38:45AM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:27:25PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > For future standardization on the "uint" name for unsigned values rather
> > than the existing "u64" one, we can for now:
> > * rename all internal values to use u
15/12/2022 10:44, Bruce Richardson:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:38:45AM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:27:25PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > For future standardization on the "uint" name for unsigned values rather
> > > than the existing "u64" one, we can for no
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 02:36:51PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 15/12/2022 10:44, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:38:45AM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:27:25PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > > For future standardization on the "uint" name fo
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:44:49AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:38:45AM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:27:25PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > For future standardization on the "uint" name for unsigned values rather
> > > than the exi
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:42:40AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:49:06AM +0800, lihuisong (C) wrote:
> >
> > 在 2022/12/14 2:27, Bruce Richardson 写道:
> > > For future standardization on the "uint" name for unsigned values rather
> > > than the existing "u64" one, we ca
15/12/2022 14:58, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 02:36:51PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 15/12/2022 10:44, Bruce Richardson:
> > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:38:45AM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:27:25PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > > > Fo
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 11:37:19AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 15/12/2022 14:58, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 02:36:51PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 15/12/2022 10:44, Bruce Richardson:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:38:45AM -0800, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > > > > On
11 matches
Mail list logo