Re: [dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion

2020-11-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
28/07/2020 07:58, Hemant Agrawal: > This patch removes the dual keyword from dual license > definitions to avoid confusion. As the *dual* word is > not required to be added SPDX license. > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal > --- > Note that following licenses are not exceptions:- > - BSD-3-C

Re: [dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion

2020-09-18 Thread Hemant Agrawal
ping ... Thomas - this change is very trivial On 7/28/2020 11:28 AM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: This patch removes the dual keyword from dual license definitions to avoid confusion. As the *dual* word is not required to be added SPDX license. Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal --- license/exceptions.

Re: [dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion

2020-07-28 Thread Hemant Agrawal
definition. I hope they have no objection in getting it corrected. Regards, Hemant > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 10:52 PM > To: Hemant Agrawal > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removin

Re: [dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion

2020-07-28 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:28:40 +0530 Hemant Agrawal wrote: > This patch removes the dual keyword from dual license > definitions to avoid confusion. As the *dual* word is > not required to be added SPDX license. > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal > --- > license/exceptions.txt | 4 ++-- > 1 file

[dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion

2020-07-27 Thread Hemant Agrawal
This patch removes the dual keyword from dual license definitions to avoid confusion. As the *dual* word is not required to be added SPDX license. Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal --- license/exceptions.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/license/exceptions.t