W dniu 20.05.2020 o 13:40, Van Haaren, Harry pisze:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Lukasz Wojciechowski
>> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 7:43 PM
>> To: David Marchand ; Van Haaren, Harry
>>
>> Cc: Jerin Jacob ; dev ; dpdk
>> stable
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: fix lcore state bug
>>
>>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lukasz Wojciechowski
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 7:43 PM
> To: David Marchand ; Van Haaren, Harry
>
> Cc: Jerin Jacob ; dev ; dpdk
> stable
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: fix lcore state bug
>
>
> W dniu 18.05.2020 o 20:39, David Marchand pisze:
> > On Mon, M
W dniu 18.05.2020 o 20:39, David Marchand pisze:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 8:25 PM Lukasz Wojciechowski
> wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> The patch is here for quite a while and I believe it's assign to you.
>> Today there were some questions about it on
>> https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=a0a7498c-
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 8:25 PM Lukasz Wojciechowski
wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> The patch is here for quite a while and I believe it's assign to you.
> Today there were some questions about it on
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464
>
> Is there anything else to be done, so it can be accepted
Hi David,
The patch is here for quite a while and I believe it's assign to you.
Today there were some questions about it on
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464
Is there anything else to be done, so it can be accepted?
Best regards
Lukasz
W dniu 28.04.2020 o 03:21, Lukasz Wojciechowski pi
nd ; nd
>> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix lcore state bug
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Lukasz Wojciechowski
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:32 AM
>>> To: Phil Yang ; Harry van Haaren
>>> ; Jerin Jacob
>>&
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Yang
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 3:54 AM
> To: Lukasz Wojciechowski ; Van Haaren,
> Harry ; Jerin Jacob
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org; nd ; nd
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix lcore state bug
>
;>> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 9:22 AM
>>>> To: Harry van Haaren ; Jerin Jacob
>>>>
>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com;
>> sta...@dpdk.org
>>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix lcore state bug
>>>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lukasz Wojciechowski
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:32 AM
> To: Phil Yang ; Harry van Haaren
> ; Jerin Jacob
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org; nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix lcore state bug
>
> Hi Phil,
org; l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com; sta...@dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix lcore state bug
>>
>> The rte_service_lcore_reset_all function stops execution of services
>> on all lcores and switches them back from ROLE_SERVICE to ROLE_RTE.
>> However the thread
Hi Lukasz,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Lukasz Wojciechowski
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 9:22 AM
> To: Harry van Haaren ; Jerin Jacob
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Lukasz Wojciechowski
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 9:22 AM
> To: Harry van Haaren ; Jerin Jacob
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix lc
The rte_service_lcore_reset_all function stops execution of services
on all lcores and switches them back from ROLE_SERVICE to ROLE_RTE.
However the thread loop for slave lcores (eal_thread_loop) distincts these
roles to set lcore state after processing delegated function.
It sets WAIT state for RO
13 matches
Mail list logo
