26/05/2020 12:08, guohongzhi:
> From: Hongzhi Guo
>
> 0x is invalid for IPv4 checksum(RFC1624)
>
> Fixes: 6006818cfb26 ("net: new checksum functions")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Reviewed-By: Morten Brørup
> Acked-by: Olivier Matz
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhi Guo
The Signed-off should be i
From: Hongzhi Guo
0x is invalid for IPv4 checksum(RFC1624)
Fixes: 6006818cfb26 ("net: new checksum functions")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Reviewed-By: Morten Brørup
Acked-by: Olivier Matz
Signed-off-by: Hongzhi Guo
---
lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion
guohongzhi,
You must use your real name in the Signed-off-by line.
The signoff must be a real name and not an alias or nickname. For further
details, please refer to:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1
Med venlig hilsen
0x is invalid for IPv4 checksum(RFC1624)
Fixes: 6006818cfb26 ("net: new checksum functions")
Reviewed-By: Morten Brørup
Acked-by: Olivier Matz
Signed-off-by: guohongzhi
---
lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
14/05/2020 03:27, guohongzhi:
> The function of rte_ipv4_cksum for calculating the
> checksum of IPv4 header is incorrect.
> This function will return checksum value like 0x.
> This value, however, is considered an illegal checksum on some switches(like
> Trident3).
>
> RFC 1624 specifies the
The function of rte_ipv4_cksum for calculating the
checksum of IPv4 header is incorrect.
This function will return checksum value like 0x.
This value, however, is considered an illegal checksum on some switches(like
Trident3).
RFC 1624 specifies the IPv4 checksum as follows:
https://tools.iet
6 matches
Mail list logo
