[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] qat: fix for VFs not getting recognized

2016-06-20 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-17 15:12, Jerin Jacob: > Thunderx nicvf also got the same problem when I rebased to > dpdk-next-net/rel_16_07. > > The root cause for this issue is that, PCI CLASS_ID EAL add > changeset(701c8d80c820461e8255dfb7387a09f0e54399f0) > has taken care only the pci devices where id table is

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] qat: fix for VFs not getting recognized

2016-06-17 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:18:30AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-06-16 16:25, Jain, Deepak K: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > > 2016-06-16 16:29, Jain, Deepak K: > > > > Due to addition of CLASS_ID in EAL, class_id is amended into the code. > > > > > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] qat: fix for VFs not getting recognized

2016-06-17 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-16 16:25, Jain, Deepak K: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > 2016-06-16 16:29, Jain, Deepak K: > > > Due to addition of CLASS_ID in EAL, class_id is amended into the code. > > > > Why the VF is not recognized? > > The class id should not be mandatory. > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] qat: fix for VFs not getting recognized

2016-06-17 Thread Jain, Deepak K
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 9:19 AM > To: Jain, Deepak K > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Griffin, John ; De Lara > Guarch, > Pablo ; Doherty, Declan > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-de

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] qat: fix for VFs not getting recognized

2016-06-16 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-16 16:29, Jain, Deepak K: > Due to addition of CLASS_ID in EAL, class_id is > amended into the code. Why the VF is not recognized? The class id should not be mandatory.