[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework

2014-12-07 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:07 PM > To: Liu, Jijiang > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin; olivier.matz at 6wind.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] i40e VXLAN

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework

2014-12-05 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> > We have got some feedback about backward compatibility of VXLAN TX checksum > > offload API with 1G/10G NIC after the i40e VXLAN > > TX checksum codes were applied, so we have to rework the APIs on i40e, > > including the changes of mbuf, i40e PMD and csum forward > > engine. > > > > The mai

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework

2014-12-02 Thread Jijiang Liu
We have got some feedback about backward compatibility of VXLAN TX checksum offload API with 1G/10G NIC after the i40e VXLAN TX checksum codes were applied, so we have to rework the APIs on i40e, including the changes of mbuf, i40e PMD and csum forward engine. The main changes in mbuf are as fo

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework

2014-12-02 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jijiang Liu > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 3:06 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework > > We have got some feedback about back