[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

2015-05-07 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> -Original Message- > From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 8:32 AM > To: Xu, HuilongX; Zoltan Kiss; Ananyev, Konstantin; dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Cao, Waterman; Cao, Min; Zhang, Helin > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PA

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

2015-05-07 Thread Olivier MATZ
[mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 6:39 PM > To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Olivier Matz; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones > > Hi, > > On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Ko

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

2015-05-07 Thread Xu, HuilongX
rs in Best regards huilong -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 6:39 PM To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Olivier Matz; dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones Hi

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

2015-04-28 Thread Zoltan Kiss
On 27/04/15 18:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-04-24 11:38, Zoltan Kiss: >> On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: >>> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indir

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

2015-04-28 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> > The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect > > mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also > > removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on > > direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements > > and

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

2015-04-27 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-24 11:38, Zoltan Kiss: > On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM > >> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect > >> mbufs when the application reserves a

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

2015-04-24 Thread Zoltan Kiss
Hi, On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM >> To: dev at dpdk.org >> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; zoltan.kiss at linaro.org; Richardson, Bruce; >> nhorman at t

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

2015-04-22 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> -Original Message- > From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; zoltan.kiss at linaro.org; Richardson, Bruce; > nhorman at tuxdriver.com; olivier.matz at 6wind.com > Subject: [PATCH v

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones

2015-04-22 Thread Olivier Matz
The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements and fixes in the mbuf ar