[dpdk-dev] ACL priority field

2020-01-27 Thread Bly, Mike
Hello, Can someone clarify what I am interpreting as a documentation conflict regarding the "priority" field for rte_table_acl_rule_add_params? Below documentation says "highest priority wins", but the header file comment says 0 is highest priority. Based on my testing with conflicting entries

Re: [dpdk-dev] ACL priority field

2020-01-29 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
Hi, > > Hello, > > Can someone clarify what I am interpreting as a documentation conflict > regarding the "priority" field for rte_table_acl_rule_add_params? > Below documentation says "highest priority wins", but the header file comment > says 0 is highest priority. Based on my testing with

Re: [dpdk-dev] ACL priority field

2020-01-29 Thread Bly, Mike
Konstantin, Ah, I see now. Yes, we are using rte_table_acl. Is there a reason these two differ in precedence selection? Regards, Mike Hi, > > Hello, > > Can someone clarify what I am interpreting as a documentation conflict > regarding the "priority" field