Re: [dpdk-dev] FW: [PATCH 5/7] stack: add non-blocking stack implementation

2019-03-01 Thread Eads, Gage
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 3:13 PM > To: Eads, Gage > Cc: Olivier Matz ; dev@dpdk.org; > arybche...@solarflare.com; Richardson, Bruce ; > Ananyev, Konstantin ; gavin...@arm.com; > honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com;

Re: [dpdk-dev] FW: [PATCH 5/7] stack: add non-blocking stack implementation

2019-03-01 Thread Thomas Monjalon
01/03/2019 21:53, Eads, Gage: > From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.m...@6wind.com] > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:06:53AM -0600, Gage Eads wrote: > > > +#define STACK_F_NB 0x0001 > > > > What about adding the RTE_ prefix? > > I'm fine with either, but there's precedent for flag macros named > _*.

[dpdk-dev] FW: [PATCH 5/7] stack: add non-blocking stack implementation

2019-03-01 Thread Eads, Gage
> -Original Message- > From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.m...@6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 5:28 AM > To: Eads, Gage > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; arybche...@solarflare.com; Richardson, Bruce > ; Ananyev, Konstantin > ; gavin...@arm.com; > honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; n...@arm.co