Akhil Goyal writes:
> Hi Ciara,
>
> I see that CI is reporting one error in autotest. Can you please check
> if it is because of your patchset?
>
> 9/96 DPDK:fast-tests / cycles_autotest FAIL 1.42s (exit status 255 or
> signal 127 SIGinvalid)
Just to note, I'm looking into that test case a bit m
..@amd.com;
> ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com; g.si...@nxp.com; roy.fan.zh...@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test
> framework
>
> 12/05/2021 18:00, Akhil Goyal:
> > > I see this patchset is merged in the crypto tree but I guess it
12/05/2021 18:00, Akhil Goyal:
> > I see this patchset is merged in the crypto tree but I guess it is not
> > definitive.
> > Am I right it is too late to do such refactoring after -rc2?
> > What is the intent?
> >
> The case is not failing in my testing. Neither it is reproducible at Ciara's
>
> I see this patchset is merged in the crypto tree but I guess it is not
> definitive.
> Am I right it is too late to do such refactoring after -rc2?
> What is the intent?
>
The case is not failing in my testing. Neither it is reproducible at Ciara's
end.
Ciara has asked to rerun the CI to ch
I see this patchset is merged in the crypto tree but I guess it is not
definitive.
Am I right it is too late to do such refactoring after -rc2?
What is the intent?
12/05/2021 15:15, Akhil Goyal:
> Hi Ciara,
>
> I see that CI is reporting one error in autotest. Can you please check if it
> is b
Hi Ciara,
I see that CI is reporting one error in autotest. Can you please check if it is
because of your patchset?
9/96 DPDK:fast-tests / cycles_autotestFAIL1.42s
(exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)
12:33:15 DPDK_TEST=cycles_autotest MALLOC_PERTURB_=44
/ho
6 matches
Mail list logo
