Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic management

2017-08-11 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
vium.com; Lu, Wenzhuo > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic > management > > On Fri, 26 May 2017 19:11:47 +0100 > Jasvinder Singh wrote: > > > The SoftNIC PMD provides SW fall-back option for the NICs not supporting > > the

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic management

2017-08-11 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 26 May 2017 19:11:47 +0100 Jasvinder Singh wrote: > The SoftNIC PMD provides SW fall-back option for the NICs not supporting > the Traffic Management (TM) features. > > SoftNIC PMD overview: > - The SW fall-back is based on the existing librte_sched DPDK library. > - The TM-agnostic por

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic management

2017-07-05 Thread Thomas Monjalon
t; > Ferruh ; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; > > jerin.jacobkollanukka...@cavium.com; Lu, Wenzhuo > > ; techbo...@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic > > management > > > > 08/06/2017 18:43, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic management

2017-07-05 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
u, Wenzhuo > ; techbo...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic > management > > 08/06/2017 18:43, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > > ... > > > > > > I'm sure I'm missing something. > > > In my unde

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic management

2017-07-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
08/06/2017 18:43, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > ... > > > > I'm sure I'm missing something. > > In my understanding, we do not need to change the ops: > > - if the device offers the capability, let's call the ops > > - else call the software fallback function > > > > What you might be missing

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic management

2017-06-08 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
... > > I'm sure I'm missing something. > In my understanding, we do not need to change the ops: > - if the device offers the capability, let's call the ops > - else call the software fallback function > What you might be missing is the observation that the approach you're describi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic management

2017-06-08 Thread Thomas Monjalon
08/06/2017 17:27, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > 08/06/2017 15:27, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing this patch set! > > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > > > > > > > Hi Jasvinder, > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic management

2017-06-08 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
Wenzhuo > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic > management > > 08/06/2017 15:27, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Thanks for reviewing this patch set! > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@mo

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic management

2017-06-08 Thread Thomas Monjalon
08/06/2017 15:27, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for reviewing this patch set! > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > > > Hi Jasvinder, > > > > 26/05/2017 20:11, Jasvinder Singh: > > > The SoftNIC PMD provides SW fall-back option for the NICs not supporting >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic management

2017-06-08 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
nt.agra...@nxp.com; > jerin.jacobkollanukka...@cavium.com; Lu, Wenzhuo > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic > management > > Hi Jasvinder, > > 26/05/2017 20:11, Jasvinder Singh: > > The SoftNIC PMD provides SW fall-back option for the NI

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic management

2017-06-07 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi Jasvinder, 26/05/2017 20:11, Jasvinder Singh: > The SoftNIC PMD provides SW fall-back option for the NICs not supporting > the Traffic Management (TM) features. Do you mean that you want to stack PMDs in order to offer some fallbacks? It means the user needs to instantiate this PMD for each H