monjalon.net; Ruifeng Wang
> > ; Phil Yang ;
> > vcchu...@amazon.com; Dharmik Thakkar ;
> > jerinjac...@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde
> > (ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com) ;
> > ferruh.yi...@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org; nd
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v
c...@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde
> (ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com) ;
> ferruh.yi...@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org; nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00/12] Arm build options rework
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 08:41:45AM +, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > > > 3) W
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 08:41:45AM +, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > > 3) We need to build kni against the aarch64 kernel headers, but it
> > > fails. It appears that kernel/linux/kni/meson.build doesn’t pass any
> > > cross-compile flags in the make command it creates. The diff below
> > > shows how
> > 3) We need to build kni against the aarch64 kernel headers, but it
> > fails. It appears that kernel/linux/kni/meson.build doesn’t pass any
> > cross-compile flags in the make command it creates. The diff below
> > shows how I hardcoded it to get it to work for now. Thoughts on how to
> > do th
> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >v14:
> > >> > > >Resent for retesting (because of suspected false negative).
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Series
> > >> > > >Tested-
> > >by:
> > >> > > >Jerin Jacob Series Tested-by: Dharmik
> > >Thakkar
> > >> > > > Series Teste
...@amazon.com; Dharmik Thakkar ;
> >jerinjac...@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde
> >(ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com) ;
> >ferruh.yi...@intel.com
> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd ; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> >; nd
> >Subject: [EXT] R
ar
>; jerinjac...@gmail.com;
>hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde
>(ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com) ;
>ferruh.yi...@intel.com
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd ; Honnappa Nagarahalli
>; nd
>Subject: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00
> >
> > > >
> > > >v14:
> > > >Resent for retesting (because of suspected false negative).
> > > >
> > > >Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Series Tested-by:
> > > >Jerin Jacob Series Tested-by: Dharmik Thakkar
> > > > Series Tested-by: Vimal Chungath
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Series Tested-by: Pa
.@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde
> (ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com) ;
> ferruh.yi...@intel.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd ; nd
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00/12] Arm build options rework
>
>
>
> > >
> > >v14:
> > >Resent for retesting
; jerinjac...@gmail.com;
> hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde (ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com)
> ; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org; nd
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00/12] Arm build options rework
>
>
> > On Jan 1, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
&g
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:16:38AM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>On Jan 11, 2021, at 5:01 AM, Bruce Richardson
><[1]bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:38:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 08/01/2021 21:20, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
>
> On Mon, J
> On Jan 11, 2021, at 5:01 AM, Bruce Richardson
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:38:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 08/01/2021 21:20, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>
> 1) Bruce - when the “-Ddefault_library=both
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:38:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 08/01/2021 21:20, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
> > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1) Bruce - when the “-Ddefault_library=both” flag is passed in, the
> > > > build
> > > fails with this er
08/01/2021 21:20, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
> > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
> > >
> > > 1) Bruce - when the “-Ddefault_library=both” flag is passed in, the build
> > fails with this error. It’s been broken for a long time; maybe this option
> > isn’t
> > supported an
>
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
> >
> > 1) Bruce - when the “-Ddefault_library=both” flag is passed in, the build
> fails with this error. It’s been broken for a long time; maybe this option
> isn’t
> supported and should be blocked earlier?
> >
> > ../../
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>
> 1) Bruce - when the “-Ddefault_library=both” flag is passed in, the build
> fails with this error. It’s been broken for a long time; maybe this option
> isn’t supported and should be blocked earlier?
>
> ../../dpdk/app/mes
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Jan 1, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> 30/12/2020 20:09, Andrew Boyer:
> >>>
> On Dec 23, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Juraj Linkeš
> >> wrote:
>
> The current way of specifying Arm config
> >
> >v14:
> >Resent for retesting (because of suspected false negative).
> >
> >Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Series Tested-by:
> >Jerin Jacob Series Tested-by: Dharmik Thakkar
> > Series Tested-by: Vimal Chungath
> >
> >
>
> Series Tested-by: Pavan Nikhilesh
>
> Also, I believe we need to
>-Original Message-
>From: dev On Behalf Of Juraj Linkeš
>Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 5:17 PM
>To: bruce.richard...@intel.com; ruifeng.w...@arm.com;
>honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; phil.y...@arm.com;
>vcchu...@amazon.com; dharmik.thak...@arm.com;
>jerinjac...@gmail.com; hemant.agra
> On Jan 1, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> wrote:
>>
>> 30/12/2020 20:09, Andrew Boyer:
>>>
On Dec 23, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Juraj Linkeš
>> wrote:
The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is
insufficient since we can't identify the SoC we're buildi
>
> 30/12/2020 20:09, Andrew Boyer:
> >
> > > On Dec 23, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Juraj Linkeš
> wrote:
> > >
> > > The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is
> > > insufficient since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from
> > > the MIDR information. For example, we can't di
30/12/2020 20:09, Andrew Boyer:
>
> > On Dec 23, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Juraj Linkeš
> > wrote:
> >
> > The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is insufficient
> > since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from the MIDR
> > information. For example, we can't distinguish betw
> On Dec 23, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
>
> The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is insufficient
> since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from the MIDR
> information. For example, we can't distinguish between N1SDP, Graviton2
> or Ampere Altra.
>
> Add
23 matches
Mail list logo
