> > > > Agree. There are multiple micro-architectures in Arm eco-system.
> > > > We
> > > should establish few simple rules to make sure algorithms perform
> > > well on all the available platforms. I established few rules in VPP
> > > and they are working fine so far.
> > >
> > > Can you share tha
> , Dharmik Thakkar ,
> "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" , nd ,
> "tho...@monjalon.net" , "ferruh.yi...@intel.com"
> , "hemant.agra...@nxp.com"
> , "chao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com"
> , "Kapoor, Prasun" ,
> nd
> Subj
>
> > > Agree. There are multiple micro-architectures in Arm eco-system. We
> > should establish few simple rules to make sure algorithms perform well
> > on all the available platforms. I established few rules in VPP and
> > they are working fine so far.
> >
> > Can you share that rules for every
> > Agree. There are multiple micro-architectures in Arm eco-system. We
> should establish few simple rules to make sure algorithms perform well on all
> the available platforms. I established few rules in VPP and they are working
> fine so far.
>
> Can you share that rules for everyone's benefi
> >> >
> >> > 9) Does anyone else facing this problem?
> >Any data on x86?
> >
> [Wang, Yipeng]
> I tried Jerin's tests on x86. So by default l3fwd on x86 will use lookup_bulk
> and SIMD instruction so there is no obvious throughput drop on both hit
> and miss cases (for hit case, there is about 2.
ology China)
>; nd ; tho...@monjalon.net; Yigit, Ferruh
>;
>hemant.agra...@nxp.com; chao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; nd
>Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/5] hash: add lock-free read-write
>concurrency
>> >
>> > 9) Does anyone else facing this problem?
>Any data o
w...@intel.com"
> , Dharmik Thakkar ,
> "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" , nd ,
> "ferruh.yi...@intel.com" ,
> "hemant.agra...@nxp.com" ,
> "chao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "Kapoor,
> Prasun"
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-
06/11/2018 10:10, Jerin Jacob:
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > Jerin, thank you for running this test and all the analysis. I have not run
> > this test. I was focused on simultaneous reads and writes. You can look at
> > file test_hash_readwrite_lf.c to look for the kind of the use cases.
> >
> , Dharmik Thakkar ,
> "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" , nd ,
> "tho...@monjalon.net" , "ferruh.yi...@intel.com"
> , "hemant.agra...@nxp.com"
> , "chao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com"
> , nd
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/5]
> > >
> > > Add lock-free read-write concurrency. This is achieved by the
> > > following changes.
> > >
> > > 1) Add memory ordering to avoid race conditions. The only race
> > > condition that can occur is - using the key store element before
> > > the key write is completed. Hence, while insert
, "dharmik.thak...@arm.com"
> , "gavin...@arm.com" ,
> "n...@arm.com" , "tho...@monjalon.net" ,
> "ferruh.yi...@intel.com" ,
> "hemant.agra...@nxp.com"
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/5] hash: add lock-free re
-Original Message-
> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:37:32 -0500
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli
> To: bruce.richard...@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com
> CC: dev@dpdk.org, yipeng1.w...@intel.com, honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com,
> dharmik.thak...@arm.com, gavin...@arm.com, n...@arm.com
> Su
12 matches
Mail list logo
