16/03/2020 18:09, Bruce Richardson:
> Static builds can take a lot of space, so reduce the number of examples
> built when doing those static builds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
No objection after one month, it is a RFC but I see nothing to change.
Applied, thanks
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 07:37:01PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 16/03/2020 18:09, Bruce Richardson:
> > Static builds can take a lot of space, so reduce the number of examples
> > built when doing those static builds.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
> > ---
> > --- a/.ci/linux-build.sh
David Marchand writes:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 6:53 PM Aaron Conole wrote:
>>
>> Bruce Richardson writes:
>>
>> > Static builds can take a lot of space, so reduce the number of examples
>> > built when doing those static builds.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
>> > ---
>>
>> It loo
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 6:53 PM Aaron Conole wrote:
>
> Bruce Richardson writes:
>
> > Static builds can take a lot of space, so reduce the number of examples
> > built when doing those static builds.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
> > ---
>
> It looks good to me. I'll try a run with R
16/03/2020 18:09, Bruce Richardson:
> Static builds can take a lot of space, so reduce the number of examples
> built when doing those static builds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
> ---
> --- a/.ci/linux-build.sh
> +++ b/.ci/linux-build.sh
> +if [ "$DEF_LIB" = "static" ] ; then
> +OPTS=
Bruce Richardson writes:
> Static builds can take a lot of space, so reduce the number of examples
> built when doing those static builds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
> ---
It looks good to me. I'll try a run with Ruifeng's no-huge series and
see if I can trigger errors on my side (and
6 matches
Mail list logo
